An experimental study of active base isolation control for seismic protection

Structural control technology has been widely accepted for the protection of structures against seismic hazards. Passive base isolation is one of structural control techniques that can be employed to enhance the performance of structures subjected to severe earthquake excitations. Isolation bearings employed at the base of structures naturally increase the structural flexibility, but concurrently result in large base displacements. The combination of base isolation with active control, i.e., an active base isolation, creates the possibility to achieve a balanced level of control performance in reductions of either floor accelerations or base displacements. Many theoretical papers have been written by researchers, on active base isolation for buildings and some experiments have been conducted for unidirectional excitations. However, earthquakes are intrinsically multi-dimensional, resulting in out of plane responses, including torsion responses of the structures. Hence, the focus of this paper is the development and experimental verification of active base isolation for buildings subjected to bi-directional seismic excitations. First, solutions to this control-orientated problem are given by a series of procedures in system identification using the proposed system identification procedure, control designs with considerations of realization based on the H2/LQG control algorithm, and methods to evaluate this control performance. Designed controllers for achieving balanced performance are validated on a six degree-of-freedom shake table in the Smart Structures Technology Laboratory at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

[1]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  Smart base‐isolated benchmark building. Part I: problem definition , 2006 .

[2]  Jiahao Lin,et al.  An Introduction to Seismic Isolation , 1993 .

[3]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Robust control of base-isolated structures under earthquake excitation , 1987 .

[4]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Control of Sliding-Isolated Buildings Using Sliding-Mode Control , 1996 .

[5]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  "SMART" BASE ISOLATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[6]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Frequency Domain Identification of Multi-Input, Multi-Output Systems Considering Physical Relationships between Measured Variables , 2005 .

[7]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Microcomputers Implementation of Digital Control Strategies for Structural Response Reduction , 1995 .

[8]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Implementation of an active mass driver using acceleration feedback control , 1996 .

[9]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Frequency domain optimal control strategies for aseismic protection , 1994 .

[10]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[11]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  "Smart" Isolation for Seismic Control , 2000 .

[12]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Benchmark problems in structural control: part I—Active Mass Driver system , 1998 .

[13]  B. Dickinson,et al.  A minimal realization algorithm for matrix sequences , 1973, CDC 1973.

[14]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Acceleration Feedback Control of MDOF Structures , 1996 .

[15]  Pei-Yang Lin,et al.  A comparative study in the semi-active control of isolated structures , 2007 .

[16]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Experimental Verification of Acceleration Feedback Control Strategies for an Active Tendon System , 1994 .

[17]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  “Smart” Base Isolation Strategies Employing Magnetorheological Dampers , 2002 .

[18]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Role of Control-Structure Interaction in Protective System Design , 1995 .

[19]  Chi-Tsong Chen,et al.  Linear System Theory and Design , 1995 .

[20]  R. Ober Balanced parametrization of classes of linear systems , 1991 .

[21]  Satish Nagarajaiah,et al.  Control of Sliding‐Isolated Bridge with Absolute Acceleration Feedback , 1993 .