Towards Unsupervised Segmentation of Extreme Weather Events

Extreme weather is one of the main mechanisms through which climate change will directly impact human society. Coping with such change as a global community requires markedly improved understanding of how global warming drives extreme weather events. While alternative climate scenarios can be simulated using sophisticated models, identifying extreme weather events in these simulations requires automation due to the vast amounts of complex high-dimensional data produced. Atmospheric dynamics, and hydrodynamic flows more generally, are highly structured and largely organize around a lower dimensional skeleton of coherent structures. Indeed, extreme weather events are a special case of more general hydrodynamic coherent structures. We present a scalable physics-based representation learning method that decomposes spatiotemporal systems into their structurally relevant components, which are captured by latent variables known as local causal states. For complex fluid flows we show our method is capable of capturing known coherent structures, and with promising segmentation results on CAM5.1 water vapor data we outline the path to extreme weather identification from unlabeled climate model simulation data.

[1]  Matthias Nießner,et al.  Spherical CNNs on Unstructured Grids , 2019, ICLR.

[2]  James Odell,et al.  Between order and chaos , 2011, Nature Physics.

[3]  P. Webster,et al.  Changes in Tropical Cyclone Number, Duration, and Intensity in a Warming Environment , 2005, Science.

[4]  Georg M. Goerg,et al.  LICORS: Light Cone Reconstruction of States for Non-parametric Forecasting of Spatio-Temporal Systems , 2012, 1206.2398.

[5]  Surendra Byna,et al.  TECA: A Parallel Toolkit for Extreme Climate Analysis , 2012, ICCS.

[6]  Hector Zenil,et al.  Causal deconvolution by algorithmic generative models , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[7]  B. R. Noack Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry , 2013 .

[8]  Daniel Walton,et al.  Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project (ARTMIP): project goals and experimental design , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[9]  A. Woeikof Tropical cyclones. , 1884, Science.

[10]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Low-dimensional chaos in a hydrodynamic system , 1983 .

[11]  K. Emanuel The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate , 1987, Nature.

[12]  P. Anderson More is different. , 1972, Science.

[13]  M. Botur,et al.  Lagrangian coherent structures , 2009 .

[14]  Prabhat,et al.  Exascale Deep Learning for Climate Analytics , 2018, SC18: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[15]  James H. Faghmous,et al.  A Big Data Guide to Understanding Climate Change: The Case for Theory-Guided Data Science , 2014, Big Data.

[16]  Karthik Kashinath,et al.  ClimateNet: bringing the power of Deep Learning to the climate community via open datasets and architectures , 2018 .

[17]  Arvind Satyanarayan,et al.  The Building Blocks of Interpretability , 2018 .

[18]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Identifying causal gateways and mediators in complex spatio-temporal systems , 2015, Nature Communications.

[19]  F. Takens,et al.  On the nature of turbulence , 1971 .

[20]  George Haller,et al.  Geodesic Transport Barriers in Jupiter's Atmosphere: A Video-Based Analysis , 2014, SIAM Rev..

[21]  G. Haller,et al.  Defining coherent vortices objectively from the vorticity , 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Computational Mechanics: Pattern and Prediction, Structure and Simplicity , 1999, ArXiv.

[23]  P. Grassberger Toward a quantitative theory of self-generated complexity , 1986 .

[24]  Klaus Sutner,et al.  Computation theory of cellular automata , 1998 .

[25]  D. F. Merriam,et al.  Annual review of earth and planetary sciences v. 7, Editor: F. A. Donath; Associate Editors: F. G. Stehli, and G. W. Wetherill, Annual Reviews, Inc., 4139 El Camino Way, Palo Alto, California, 94036, 1979, 517p., 17 (U.S.), 17.50 elsewhere , 1980 .

[26]  Celso Grebogi,et al.  Entropy-based generating Markov partitions for complex systems. , 2017, Chaos.

[27]  Max Welling,et al.  Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Networks and the Icosahedral CNN 1 , 2019 .

[28]  Mohammad Farazmand,et al.  A critical comparison of Lagrangian methods for coherent structure detection. , 2017, Chaos.

[29]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi Optimal Nonlinear Prediction of Random Fields on Networks , 2003, DMCS.

[30]  Karthik Kashinath,et al.  Segmenting and Tracking Extreme Climate Events using Neural Networks , 2017 .

[31]  Adam Rupe,et al.  Local Causal States and Discrete Coherent Structures , 2018, Chaos.