Thoracoscopic modified pleural tent for spontaneous pneumothorax.

OBJECTIVES We developed a modified pleural tent (m-tent) procedure and used it in our hospital in almost 30 consecutive patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. The objective of this study was to clarify the feasibility and effectiveness of a thoracoscopic m-tent for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. METHODS From July 2013 to November 2014, 107 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax were treated in our institution. Eighty-nine of these patients were analysed retrospectively. The inclusion criteria for thoracoscopic m-tent for spontaneous pneumothorax were multiple and widespread bullae, postoperative relapse and secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. The surgical procedures were usually performed through three ports. After bullectomy, an m-tent is made to strip the parietal pleura off the chest wall from about the level of the fourth or fifth rib to the apex, and two or three ligations are then applied to fix the pleural tent and lung parenchyma. Patients in whom an m-tent was not indicated underwent bullectomy plus coverage using absorbable materials. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients underwent bullectomy plus m-tent (m-tent group) and 62 underwent bullectomy plus coverage over a staple line using an absorbable material such as a polyglycolic acid sheet or nitrocellulose sheet (coverage group). No severe postoperative complications were observed in either group. The m-tent and coverage groups showed significant differences in operation time (129 vs 86 min, mean), haemorrhage (12.8 vs 7.2 ml), postoperative hospital stay (3.7 vs 2.9 days) and postoperative painkiller intake (8.6 vs 6.8 days). Recurrence was observed in 1 (3.7%) and 2 patients (3.2%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The thoracoscopic m-tent procedure requires a longer operation, a longer hospital stay and greater painkiller intake. However, these differences are acceptable, and an m-tent should be considered as an option for pleural reinforcement in spontaneous pneumothorax, especially in patients who are complicated with severe pulmonary emphysema, widespread bullae or recurrent pneumothorax.

[1]  S. Chaubey,et al.  A meta-analysis assessing the benefits of concomitant pleural tent procedure after upper lobectomy. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  S. Ishimoto,et al.  Cause and management of recurrent primary spontaneous pneumothorax after thoracoscopic stapler blebectomy. , 2011, Asian journal of surgery.

[3]  A. Arnold,et al.  Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010 , 2010, Thorax.

[4]  A. Arnold,et al.  guideline 2010 British Thoracic Society pleural disease Management of spontaneous pneumothorax , 2010 .

[5]  K. Nakanishi An apical symphysial technique using a wide absorbable mesh placed on the apex for primary spontaneous pneumothorax , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  E. Lim,et al.  Recurrence rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery in the prevention of recurrent pneumothoraces: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials , 2007, The Lancet.

[7]  T. Omori,et al.  Staple line coverage with absorbable mesh after thoracoscopic bullectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  T. Naruke,et al.  Impact of additional pleurodesis in video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  T. de Giacomo,et al.  Thoracoscopic pleural tent. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  J. Mouroux,et al.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax: technique and results of one hundred cases. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  R. Klopstock,et al.  The pleural tent as a simultaneous tailoring procedure in combination with pulmonary resection. , 1956, American review of tuberculosis.

[12]  E. Gaensler Parietal pleurectomy for recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. , 1956, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.