Determining Community Health Status Priorities in an Online Analytic Processing (OLAP) Environment

Introduction: The determination of priorities is an essential component of community health status assessment. Yet, there is an acknowledged need for a systematic method which will utilize data in standardized comparisons to yield priorities based on objective analyses. Method: We have deployed a web-based system with: a flexible online analytic processing (OLAP) interface; multiple sources of event-level data conformed to common definitions in a data warehouse structure; and, centralized technical infrastructure with distributed analytical capabilities. The PRIORITIZATION TOOL integrated into the system takes full advantage of the granularity of multidimensional sources of data to: apply a series of defined objective criteria; vary the weight of those criteria and detect the reordering of the rankings in real-time; and, apply the prioritization algorithm to different categories of health status outcomes. Results: In our example, mortality outcomes for Miami-Dade County, Florida, were considered with three different weighting combinations of the four primary ranking criteria. The resultant analyses return markedly different mortality priority rankings based upon the selection and weighting of the criteria. Conclusion: Rankings of community health outcomes based on a static set of criteria with fixed weighting factors may not provide sufficient information necessary for priority setting and may, in fact, be misleading.

[1]  S Dandoy,et al.  A priority rating system for public health programs. , 1990, Public health reports.

[2]  B M Dickens,et al.  Bioethics for clinicians: 13. Resource allocation. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[3]  M. Fraser,et al.  Local health departments and GIS: the perspective of the National Association of County and City Health Officials. , 1999, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[4]  Douglas K. Martin,et al.  Participation in health care priority-setting through the eyes of the participants , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[5]  Craig Mitton,et al.  Priority setting in health authorities: a novel approach to a historical activity. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[6]  C. Mitton,et al.  Tools of the trade: a comparative analysis of approaches to priority setting in healthcare , 2003, Health services management research.

[7]  Peter Singer,et al.  A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care Institutions , 2003, Health Care Analysis.

[8]  Carolyn J Leep,et al.  2005 National profile of local health departments. , 2006, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[9]  Kurt C Stange,et al.  A sense of priorities for the healthcare commons. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  Douglas K. Martin,et al.  Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting , 2009, BMC health services research.

[11]  James Studnicki,et al.  NC CATCH: Advancing Public Health Analytics , 2010, Online journal of public health informatics.

[12]  James Studnicki,et al.  Local health department priority setting: an exploratory study. , 2010, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.