Evaluation of meniscal lesions with high field (1.5 T) and new concept dedicated (0.31 T) MR systems: imaging findings and correlation with arthroscopy
暂无分享,去创建一个
A Paolicchi | Virna Zampa | Francesco Ruschi | M Barattini | Fabio Paolicchi | Iacopo Castellini | Lorenzo Andreani | Michele Lisanti | Carlo Bartolozzi
[1] A. V. van Vugt,et al. Acute peripheral joint injury: cost and effectiveness of low-field-strength MR imaging--results of randomized controlled trial. , 2005, Radiology.
[2] Naoto Hayashi,et al. Utilization of low-field MR scanners. , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
[3] M. Østergaard,et al. Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiography , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[4] A. Cotten,et al. High- versus low-field MR imaging. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.
[5] H. Imhof,et al. Comparison of low field (0.2T) and high field (1.5T) MR imaging in the differentiation of torned from intact menisci. , 1999, European journal of radiology.
[6] P. Parizel,et al. Low-field versus high-field MR imaging of the knee: a comparison of signal behaviour and diagnostic performance. , 1995, European journal of radiology.
[7] Henrik S. Thomsen,et al. MRI of the arthritic small joints: comparison of extremity MRI (0.2 T) vs high-field MRI (1.5 T) , 2001, European Radiology.