Adjoint-based optimization for understanding and suppressing jet noise

Advanced simulation tools, particularly large-eddy simulation techniques, are becoming capable of making quality predictions of jet noise for realistic nozzle geometries and at engineering relevant flow conditions. Increasing computer resources will be a key factor in improving these predictions still further. Quality prediction, however, is only a necessary condition for the use of such simulations in design optimization. Predictions do not themselves lead to quieter designs. They must be interpreted or harnessed in some way that leads to design improvements. As yet, such simulations have not yielded any simplifying principals that offer general design guidance. The turbulence mechanisms leading to jet noise remain poorly described in their complexity. In this light, we have implemented and demonstrated an aeroacoustic adjoint-based optimization technique that automatically calculates gradients that point the direction in which to adjust controls in order to improve designs. This is done with only a single flow solutions and a solution of an adjoint system, which is solved at computational cost comparable to that for the flow. Optimization requires iterations, but having the gradient information provided via the adjoint accelerates convergence in a manner that is insensitive to the number of parameters to be optimized. This paper, which follows from a presentation at the 2010 IUTAM Symposium on Computational Aero-Acoustics for Aircraft Noise Prediction, reviews recent and ongoing efforts by the author and co-workers. It provides a new formulation of the basic approach and demonstrates the approach on a series of model flows, culminating with a preliminary result for a turbulent jet.

[1]  Simon Mendez,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Perfectly-Expanded Supersonic Jets: Quality Assessment and Validation , 2010 .

[2]  Jonathan B. Freund,et al.  Proposed Inflow/Outflow Boundary Condition for Direct Computation of Aerodynamic Sound , 1997 .

[3]  M. Lighthill On sound generated aerodynamically II. Turbulence as a source of sound , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  Ali Uzun,et al.  Simulation of Noise Generation in Near-Nozzle Region of a Chevron Nozzle Jet , 2009 .

[5]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[6]  J. Freund,et al.  A noise-controlled free shear flow , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  Clifford A. Brown,et al.  Parametric Testing of Chevrons on Single Flow Hot Jets , 2004 .

[8]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[9]  Mingjun Wei,et al.  Some Small Changes That Make a Mixing Layer Very Quiet , 2005 .

[10]  Jean-Paul Bonnet,et al.  Subsonic jet noise reduction by fluidic control: The interaction region and the global effect , 2008 .

[11]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Evolution Strategies for Automatic Optimization of Jet Mixing , 2001 .

[12]  Extremizing Feedback Control of a High-Speed and High-Reynolds-Number Jet , 2009 .

[13]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Unsteady Optimization Using a Discrete Adjoint Approach Applied to Aeroacoustic Shape Design , 2008 .

[14]  Mo Samimy,et al.  Active Control of Noise in Supersonic Jets Using Plasma Actuators , 2009 .

[15]  Ephraim Gutmark,et al.  Near-Field Investigation of Chevron Nozzle Mechanisms , 2008 .

[16]  S. Lele,et al.  Current Status of Jet Noise Predictions Using Large-Eddy Simulation , 2008 .

[17]  M. E. Goldstein,et al.  A generalized acoustic analogy , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Roger Temam,et al.  DNS-based predictive control of turbulence: an optimal benchmark for feedback algorithms , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  M. Lighthill On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory , 1952, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Identification of Sound Sources in Large-Eddy Simulations of Jets , 2007 .

[21]  Sanjiva K. Lele,et al.  Review of the current status of jet noise predictions using large-eddy simulation (invited) , 2006 .

[22]  Mo Samimy,et al.  Control of a Heated High Reynolds Number Mach 0.9 Jet Using Plasma Actuators , 2008 .

[23]  James J. McGuirk,et al.  Using large eddy simulation within an acoustic analogy approach for jet noise modelling , 2008 .

[24]  Jonathan B. Freund,et al.  Adjoint-based Control of the Noise from a Turbulent Mixing Layer , 2006 .

[25]  Mingjun Wei Jet Noise Control by Adjoint-Based Optimization , 2004 .

[26]  Daniel J. Bodony,et al.  Aeroacoustic predictions in complex geometries , 2010 .

[27]  D. G. Crighton,et al.  Basic principles of aerodynamic noise generation , 1975 .

[28]  Sanjiva K. Lele,et al.  Robustness of Acoustic Analogies for Predicting Mixing-Layer Noise , 2006 .

[29]  Sanjiva K. Lele,et al.  Jet noise prediction of cold and hot subsonic jets using large-eddy simulation , 2004 .

[30]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  Mean flow refraction effects on sound radiated from localized sources in a jet , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  Randall Ray Kleinman On the turbulence-generated sound and control of compressible mixing layers , 2010 .

[32]  J. Freund Noise sources in a low-Reynolds-number turbulent jet at Mach 0.9 , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  Luis Santos,et al.  Aerodynamic shape optimization using the adjoint method , 2007 .

[34]  Sébastien Barré,et al.  Simulation of a hot coaxial jet: Direct noise prediction and flow-acoustics correlations , 2009 .

[35]  Mo Samimy,et al.  Active control of a Mach 0.9 jet for noise mitigation using plasma actuators , 2007 .

[36]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Numerical simulation of a Mach 1.92 turbulent jet and its sound field , 2000 .