The Steady‐State Dipole‐Flow Test for Characterization of Hydraulic Conductivity Statistics in a Highly Permeable Aquifer: Horkheimer Insel Site, Germany

Over the last decade the dipole‐flow test (DFT) evolved from the general idea of using recirculatory flow to evaluate aquifer properties, to the development of prototype instrumentation and feasibility studies, to a reliable tool for characterization of aquifer heterogeneity. The DFT involves the interpretation of head in recirculatory flow between injection and extraction sections (chambers) in a single well isolated from each other by a multipacker system. In this study, the steady‐state dipole flow test (DFT) has been used to characterize the statistics of horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kr) of the highly permeable, heterogeneous, and thin aquifer at the Horkheimer Insel site, Germany. In previous studies, Kr estimates were based on the steady‐state head difference between chambers. A new by‐chamber interpretation is proposed that is based on drawdown within each individual chamber. This interpretation yields more detailed information on structure of heterogeneity of the aquifer without introducing complexity into the analysis. The DFT results indicate that Kr ranges from 49 to 6000 m/day (mean In Kr [(m/s)]∼—4, and variance of In Kr [(m/s)] ∼ 1–2). Descriptive statistics from the DFT compare well with those from previous field and laboratory tests (pumping, borehole flowmeter, and permeameter tests and grain‐size analysis) at this site. It is shown that the role of confining boundaries in the DFT interpretation is negligible even in this case of a thin (< 4 m thick) aquifer. This study demonstrates the flexibility of the DFT and expands the potential application of this method to a wide range of hydrogeologic settings.

[1]  H. Bouwer,et al.  A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells , 1976 .

[2]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  A note on packer, slug, and recovery tests in unconfined aquifers , 1978 .

[3]  G. Dagan Time‐dependent macrodispersion for solute transport in anisotropic heterogeneous aquifers , 1988 .

[4]  Georg Teutsch,et al.  The environmental research field site "Horkheimer Insel" : research program, instrumentation and first results , 1990 .

[5]  Allan D. Woodbury,et al.  The geostatistical characteristics of the borden aquifer , 1991 .

[6]  Michael A. Celia,et al.  Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: 3. Hydraulic c , 1992 .

[7]  T. R. MacDonald,et al.  Modeling the Free Surface of an Unconfined Aquifer Near a Recirculation Well , 1993 .

[8]  Z. J. Kabala,et al.  The dipole flow test: A new single‐borehole test for aquifer characterization , 1993 .

[9]  Georg Teutsch,et al.  Forced and natural gradient tracer tests in a highly heterogeneous porous aquifer: instrumentation and measurements , 1994 .

[10]  Vitaly A. Zlotnik,et al.  Interpretation of Slug and Packer Tests in Anisotropic Aquifers , 1994 .

[11]  G. Teutsch,et al.  Effects of the investigation scale on pumping test results in heterogeneous porous aquifers , 1994 .

[12]  Effect of Boundary Conditions on Dipole Flow , 1994 .

[13]  V. Zlotnik,et al.  Modification of Dagan’s Numerical Method for Slug and Packer Test Interpretation , 1994 .

[14]  S. C. Young,et al.  Characterization of High‐K Pathways by Borehole Flowmeter and Tracer Tests , 1995 .

[15]  Theory of Dipole Flow in Uniform Anisotropic Aquifers , 1996 .

[16]  E. Bair,et al.  Variations in capture-zone geometry of a partially penetrating pumping well in an unconfined aquifer , 1996 .

[17]  Vitaly A. Zlotnik,et al.  Average steady nonuniform flow in stratified formations , 1997 .

[18]  Z. Kabala,et al.  Performance of the steady‐state dipole flow test in layered aquifers , 1997 .

[19]  R. L. Burger,et al.  Measurement of anisotropic hydraulic conductivity in unconsolidated sands: A case study from a shoreface deposit, Oyster, Virginia , 1997 .

[20]  Giorgio Cassiani,et al.  Hydraulics of a partially penetrating well : solution to a mixed-type boundary value problem via dual integral equations , 1998 .

[21]  Brian R. Zurbuchen,et al.  Dipole Probe: Design and Field Applications of a Single‐Borehole Device for Measurements of Vertical Variations of Hydraulic Conductivity , 1998 .

[22]  K. Belitz,et al.  Cross‐Well Slug Testing in Unconfined Aquifers: A Case Study from the Sleepers River Watershed, Vermont , 1999 .

[23]  Groundwater flow near vertical recirculatory wells: effect of skin on flowgeometry and travel times with implications for aquifer remediation , 1999 .

[24]  Brian R. Zurbuchen,et al.  Support volume and scale effect in hydraulic conductivity: Experimental aspects , 2000 .

[25]  S. Hvilshøj,et al.  Single-Well Dipole Flow Tests: Parameter Estimation and Field Testing , 2000 .

[26]  V. Zlotnik,et al.  Asymmetric Dipole‐Flow Test in a Fractured Carbonate Aquifer , 2002, Ground water.