Setting Standards: A Systematic Approach to Managing Public Health and Safety Risks

Standards are an effective means for managing hazardous technologies only if three conditions are satisfied: a setting general standards is preferable to case-by-case decision making; b some general safety philosophy, balancing risk and other factors, can be justified on normative grounds; c that philosophy is faithfully translated into operational terms. In practice, standards are rarely developed and enforced in an integrated systematic way. As a result, they often miss their mark. This guide presents a general framework for the design, development, and implementation of safety standards. That framework is derived from the logical character of the standard setters' task and from experience with actual standards. It first identifies the conditions under which standards are an appropriate management tool. Second, it presents four generic methods that may be used to develop safety policy. Third, it characterizes the design issues that arise in making that policy operational. At each step, it suggests particular strategies along with their inherent strengths and weaknesses. In particular, it shows the sensitivity of a standard's effectiveness to seemingly technical aspects of the way it is drafted.

[1]  R. Bovbjerg.  What is policy analysis , 1985 .

[2]  Talbot Page,et al.  A Generic View of Toxic Chemicals and Similar Risks , 1978 .

[3]  Edwin L. Johnson.  Risk Assessment in an Administrative Agency , 1982 .

[4]  Chris Whipple.  Energy production risks: what perspective should we take , 1981 .

[5]  K. W. Lee,et al.  Fingerprinting pollutant discharges from synfuels plants. , 1981, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  J. Trauberman.  Superfund: a legal update , 1981 .

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived risk and quantitative safety goals for nuclear power , 1980 .

[8]  D. Lee,et al.  Asbestos and Disease , 1978 .

[9]  J. Graham,et al.  The Scientific Basis of Health and Safety Regulation , 1982 .

[10]  Elizabeth Martin,et al.  Chapter 16 – Surveys as Social Indicators: Problems in Monitoring Trends , 1983 .

[11]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  The Scientific Basis of Health and Safety Regulation , 1982 .

[12]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Risk Analysis: Understanding “How Safe is Safe Enough?“ , 1981 .

[13]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies , 1982 .

[14]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  “The Public” Vs. “The Experts”: Perceived Vs. Actual Disagreements About Risks of Nuclear Power , 1983 .

[15]  Chauncey Starr.  Risk Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants: A Pragmatic Proposal1 , 1981 .

[16]  Gerald J.S. Wilde,et al.  The Theory of Risk Homeostasis: Implications for Safety and Health , 1982 .

[17]  R. Dawes.  A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. , 1971 .

[18]  H. M. Trebing,et al.  The Strategy of Social Regulation , 1982 .

[19]  William W. May.  $s for Lives: Ethical Considerations in the Use of Cost/Benefit Analysis by For‐Profit Firms , 1982 .

[20]  E. Calabrese.  Methodological approaches to deriving environmental and occupational health standards , 1978 .

[21]  Christoph Hohenemser,et al.  Target: Highway Risks: II. The Government Regulators , 1979 .

[22]  Chris Hope,et al.  Costs of nuclear accidents Implications for reactor choice , 1982 .

[23]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  “Acceptable risk”: The case of nuclear power , 1983 .

[24]  Lester Lave,et al.  The Strategy of Social Regulation , 1981 .

[25]  L. Hedges,et al.  Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. , 1980 .

[26]  C Whipple,et al.  Risks of Risk Decisions , 1980, Science.

[27]  P Slovic,et al.  The nature of technological hazard. , 1983, Science.

[28]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[29]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Worker/Public Protection: The Double Standard , 1981 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[31]  Handling Hazardous Waste , 1980 .

[32]  S. Nadis.  The Solution is the Problem , 1979 .

[33]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  A primer for policy analysis , 1978 .

[34]  Evan Vlachos,et al.  The dynamics of technical controversy , 1981 .