Efficiency and regulation of recruitment during colony emigration by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus

Recruitment helps insect societies by bringing individuals to places where work needs to be done, but it also imposes energetic and opportunity costs. The net effect depends both on recruitment efficiency and on the ease with which insects can find work sites on their own. This study examined both of these factors for colony emigration by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus. Emigrations were organized by a corps of active ants who transported the rest of the colony. These active ants either found new sites independently or followed tandem runs led by successful scouts. Although most tandem runs broke apart before reaching their target, even lost followers found the new site faster than did unguided searchers. When the new site was near the old nest, tandem runs were rare and summoned only a small proportion of the transporter corps. When the new site was instead distant and inconspicuous, tandem runs were common and brought roughly one third of the transporters. This pattern likely results from the quorum rule used by individual scouts to decide when to switch from tandem runs to transports. By monitoring how many nestmates have already found the nest, the ants ensure that the costs of recruitment are born only when necessary.

[1]  T. Seeley The Wisdom of the Hive , 1995 .

[2]  E. Wilson Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith) 2. An information analysis of the odour trail , 1962 .

[3]  S. Pratt,et al.  Quorum responses and consensus decision making , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  B. Hölldobler Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Defense of food supply by eusocial colonies , 1987 .

[6]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in honey bee swarms , 2006 .

[7]  J. Pasteels,et al.  Caste polyethism and collective defense in the ant, Pbeidole pallidula: the outcome of quantitative differences in recruitment , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  T. Seeley,et al.  Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: the speed and accuracy trade-off , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  S. Pratt Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[10]  P. Visscher Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects. , 2007, Annual review of entomology.

[11]  James W. Haefner,et al.  Spatial Model of Movement and Foraging in Harvester Ants (Pogonomyrmex) (II): The Roles of Environment and Seed Dispersion , 1994 .

[12]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Ants estimate area using Buffon's needle , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  T. Seeley,et al.  Assessing the benefits of cooperation in honeybee foraging: search costs, forage quality, and competitive ability , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  James F. A. Traniello,et al.  Resource Assessment, Recruitment Behavior, and Organization of Cooperative Prey Retrieval in the Ant Formica schaufussi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[15]  J. Lachaud,et al.  Graded recruitment and hunting strategies linked to prey weight and size in the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[16]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  On foraging, recruitment systems and optimum number of scouts in eusocial colonies , 1992, Insectes Sociaux.

[17]  U. Maschwitz,et al.  Individual specific trails in the antLeptothorax affinis (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) , 1986, Experientia.

[18]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Visual cues and trail-following idiosyncrasy inleptothorax unifasciatus: An orientation process during foraging , 1988, Insectes Sociaux.

[20]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Benefits of recruitment in honey bees: effects of ecology and colony size in an individual-based model , 2006 .

[21]  S. Pratt Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[22]  F. Dyer The biology of the dance language. , 2002, Annual review of entomology.

[23]  P. Visscher,et al.  Honeybee colonies achieve fitness through dancing , 2002, Nature.

[24]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Navigation using visual landmarks by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.

[25]  E. J. Collins,et al.  The hidden cost of information in collective foraging , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[27]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Information flow and regulation of foraging activity in bumble bees (Bombus spp.) , 2004 .

[29]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  The multiple recruitment systems of the african weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From nonlinearity to optimality: pheromone trail foraging by ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[33]  Richter Mr Social Wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) Foraging Behavior , 2000 .

[34]  Carl Anderson,et al.  The adaptive value of inactive foragers and the scout-recruit system in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies , 2001 .

[35]  Peter Mehmel,et al.  A Hidden Cost , 2009 .

[36]  S. Barker The hidden cost. , 2007 .

[37]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Communication and orientation during foraging and emigration in the antFormica fusca , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[38]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Optimality of collective choices: A stochastic approach , 2003, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[40]  S. Pratt,et al.  A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Regulation of ants' foraging to resource productivity , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized structures in a superorganism: do ants "behave" like molecules? , 2006 .

[43]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. , 1970 .

[44]  J. Pasteels,et al.  Releaser Pheromones in Termites , 2019, Pheromone Communication in Social Insects.

[45]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Probabilistic behaviour in ants: A strategy of errors? , 1983 .

[46]  M. Winston,et al.  Pheromone Communication in Social Insects , 1997 .

[47]  M. Möglich Social organization of nest emigration inLeptothorax (Hym., Form.) , 1978, Insectes Sociaux.

[48]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Why do honey bees dance? , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[49]  Bert Hölldobler,et al.  Communication by tandem running in the antCamponotus sericeus , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[50]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Teaching with Evaluation in Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[51]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective decision making through food recruitment , 1990, Insectes Sociaux.

[52]  J. Nieh Recruitment communication in stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) , 2004 .