A Lesson from Robotics: Modeling Infants as Autonomous Agents

Although computational models are playing an increasingly important role in developmental psychology, at least one lesson from robotics is still being learned: Modeling epigenetic processes often requires simulating an embodied, autonomous organism. This article first contrasts prevailing models of infant cognition with an agent-based approach. A series of infant studies by Baillargeon (1986; Baillargeon & DeVos, 1991) is described, and an eye-movement model is then used to simulate infants' visual activity in this study. I conclude by describing three behavioral predictions of the eye-movement model and discussing the implications of this work for infant cognition research.

[1]  R. Baillargeon.  Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants , 1986, Cognition.

[2]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Self-selection of Input Stimuli for Improving Performance , 1993 .

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. , 1997, Psychological review.

[4]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[5]  T. Simon,et al.  Computational evidence for the foundations of numerical competence , 1998 .

[6]  D. Mareschal,et al.  A computational and neuropsychological account of object‐oriented behaviours in infancy , 1999 .

[7]  R. Baillargeon.  Young infants’ expectations about hidden objects: a reply to three challenges , 1999 .

[8]  E. Spelke.  Nativism, empiricism, and the origins of knowledge , 1998 .

[9]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  An Epigenetic Perspective on the Development of Self-Produced Locomotion and Its Consequences , 1994 .

[10]  E. Thelen,et al.  The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  A. Barto,et al.  Optimal Control Methods for Simulating the Perception of Causality in Young Infants , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[12]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Object permanence in young infants: further evidence. , 1991, Child development.

[13]  Linda B. Smith.  Article with Peer Commentaries and Response Do Infants Possess Innate Knowledge Structures? the Con Side the Nativist's Argument , 2022 .

[14]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .

[15]  M. Haith.  Who put the cog in infant cognition ? Is rich interpretation too costly ? , 1998 .

[16]  Ken Goldberg,et al.  Neural Networks in Robotics , 1993 .

[17]  D. Parisi,et al.  The Agent-Based Approach: A New Direction for Computational Models of Development , 2001 .

[18]  R. Held,et al.  MOVEMENT-PRODUCED STIMULATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF VISUALLY GUIDED BEHAVIOR. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[19]  Matthew Schlesinger,et al.  Building a better baby: embodied models of infant cognition , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  G. Mettaa,et al.  A developmental approach to visually-guided reaching in artificial systems , 1999 .

[21]  D. Parisi,et al.  Learning to Reach by Constraining the Movement Search Space , 2000 .

[22]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  Mechanisms of Categorization in Infancy. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.