Design method for a local energy cooperative network using distributed energy technologies

We propose a method for designing a local energy cooperative network (EneCoN) that uses new technologies for heating and power in a combined way. The method comprises six steps, including the generation of different technology options, energy balance modeling of the demand and supply, and multiobjective evaluation and optimization. As a decision-support tool, ternary diagrams are applied to analyze the effect of the mix of energy consumers in an EneCoN (i.e., residents, offices, or hospitals) on the objective function. The overall outcome of applying the method is a suggestion for the technology mix in the EneCoN that minimizes design objectives such as cost and environmental impacts with consideration of the mix of energy consumers as a design parameter. A case study was conducted on the installation of photovoltaic power generators, solar heat collectors, and fuel cells as new energy technologies in the target cities Tokyo, Sapporo, and Naha. Differences in the climate and energy demand profile were well reflected in the calculation, and different suggestions for the technology mix were obtained. The method also allowed good visualization of various complex design options (e.g., consumers, technology types, and the degree of combination) and can serve as a solid basis for designing energy systems.

[1]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Centralised and distributed electricity systems , 2008 .

[2]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Organizing Self‐Organizing Systems , 2012 .

[3]  W. McDowall,et al.  Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: A review of the hydrogen futures literature , 2006 .

[4]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Distributed multi-generation: A comprehensive view , 2009 .

[5]  Patrick Lauenburg,et al.  Smart district heating networks – A simulation study of prosumers’ impact on technical parameters in distribution networks , 2014 .

[6]  Alemayehu Gebremedhin,et al.  Introducing District Heating in a Norwegian town – Potential for reduced Local and Global Emissions , 2012 .

[7]  R. Kannan,et al.  Modelling the UK residential energy sector under long-term decarbonisation scenarios: Comparison between energy systems and sectoral modelling approaches , 2009 .

[8]  Yasunori Kikuchi,et al.  Risk Classification and Identification for Chemicals Management in Process Design , 2013 .

[9]  Masahiko Hirao,et al.  Hierarchical Activity Model for Risk-Based Decision Making , 2009 .

[10]  Yoshiki Yamagata,et al.  Simulating a future smart city: An integrated land use-energy model , 2013 .

[11]  Kevin Sartor,et al.  Simulation and optimization of a CHP biomass plant and district heating network , 2014 .

[12]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Combined cooling, heating and power: A review of performance improvement and optimization , 2014 .

[13]  David Wallace,et al.  Integrated model framework for the evaluation of an SOFC/GT system as a centralized power source , 2004 .

[14]  Mats Söderström,et al.  Biomass gasification in district heating systems - The effect of economic energy policies , 2010 .

[15]  Mitsuhiro Kubota,et al.  Tackling Power Outages in Japan: The Earthquake Compels a Swift Transformation of the Power Supply , 2011 .

[16]  Yasunori Kikuchi,et al.  Activity and Data Models for Process Assessment Considering Sustainability , 2014 .

[17]  Michihisa Koyama,et al.  A scenario analysis of future energy systems based on an energy flow model represented as functionals of technology options , 2014 .

[18]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Decision framework for chemical process design including different stages of environmental, health, and safety assessment , 2008 .

[19]  Kenshi Itaoka,et al.  Present Status and Points of Discussion for Future Energy Systems in Japan from the Aspects of Technology Options , 2014 .