SAR Image Despeckling Based on Nonsubsampled Shearlet Transform

Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Image despeckling is an important problem in SAR image processing since speckle may interfere with automatic interpretation. This paper presents a new approach for despeckling based on nonsubsampled shearlet transform. The approach introduced here presents two major contributions: (a) Translation-invariant Nonsubsampled Shearlet Transform (NSST) is designed to get more directional subbands which help to capture the anisotropic information of SAR image, and an estimation of speckle variance based on NSST is modeled to shrink NSST coefficients; (b) NSST coefficients are divided into several classes based on NSST- Multiscale Local Coefficient Variation (NSST-MLCV), which is helpful to reduce the undesired over-shrinkage, and shrinkage factor is obtained by computing the prior ratio and the likelihood ratio through mask. This model allows us to classify the NSST coefficients into classes having different degrees of heterogeneity, which can reduce the shrinkage ratio for heterogeneity regions while suppresses speckle effectively to realize both despeckling and detail preservation. Experimental results, carried out on both artificially speckled images and true SAR images, demonstrate that the proposed filtering approach outperforms the previous filters, irrespective of the features of the underlying reflectivity.

[1]  Fabrizio Argenti,et al.  Speckle removal from SAR images in the undecimated wavelet domain , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Dmitri Loguinov,et al.  Bayesian wavelet shrinkage with edge detection for SAR image despeckling , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  From Wavelets to Shearlets and back again , 2007 .

[4]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  Statistical properties of logarithmically transformed speckle , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  E. Nezry,et al.  Maximum A Posteriori Speckle Filtering And First Order Texture Models In Sar Images , 1990, 10th Annual International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  Development of a digital shearlet transform based on Pseudo-Polar FFT , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[8]  G. Easley,et al.  Sparse directional image representations using the discrete shearlet transform , 2008 .

[9]  Minh N. Do,et al.  The Nonsubsampled Contourlet Transform: Theory, Design, and Applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Digital Image Enhancement and Noise Filtering by Use of Local Statistics , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  A Framework for Discrete Integral Transformations I-The Pseudopolar Fourier Transform , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  Dennis M. Healy,et al.  An M-channel directional filter bank compatible with the contourlet and shearlet frequency tiling , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[13]  Jean-Marc Boucher,et al.  Multiscale MAP filtering of SAR images , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  S. Quegan,et al.  Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images , 1998 .

[15]  E. Candès,et al.  New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities , 2004 .

[16]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Minh N. Do,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Image Processing the Contourlet Transform: an Efficient Directional Multiresolution Image Representation , 2022 .

[18]  D. Labate,et al.  Resolution of the wavefront set using continuous shearlets , 2006, math/0605375.

[19]  Fabrizio Argenti,et al.  LMMSE and MAP estimators for reduction of multiplicative noise in the nonsubsampled contourlet domain , 2009, Signal Process..

[20]  E. Nezry,et al.  Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity , 1990 .

[21]  Maoguo Gong,et al.  SAR Image Despeckling Based on Local Homogeneous-Region Segmentation by Using Pixel-Relativity Measurement , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[23]  T. Nabil SAR Image Filtering in Wavelet Domain by Subband Depended Shrink , 2009 .

[24]  Mark J. T. Smith,et al.  A filter bank for the directional decomposition of images: theory and design , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[25]  J. Goodman Some fundamental properties of speckle , 1976 .

[26]  C. Burrus,et al.  Noise reduction using an undecimated discrete wavelet transform , 1996, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[27]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Mark J. Shensa,et al.  The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the a trous and Mallat algorithms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[29]  Ridha Touzi,et al.  A review of speckle filtering in the context of estimation theory , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..