Aerodynamic analysis and design of Busemann biplane: towards efficient supersonic flight

Aiming to realize a low-drag supersonic transport, Busemann biplane concept was adopted in this study. Two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) biplanes were analysed and designed to improve their aerodynamic performance using computational fluid dynamics. It was confirmed that 3D biplane wings have better aerodynamic-performance areas than 2D biplane airfoils. A winglet is also useful for improvement of their aerodynamic performance. Aerodynamic characteristics of these biplanes at their off-design conditions were also analysed. In 3D wings, a flow choking and its attendant hysteresis as starting problems, which arise when the biplanes accelerate from low Mach numbers, disappear at lower Mach numbers than those in 2D airfoils. It was confirmed that hinged slats and flaps are effective to settle these issues. Finally, interference effects of a body with the biplanes were investigated. When the biplane wings are affected by the expansion waves from the body, their aerodynamic performance at the design Mach number and the starting Mach number are better and lower than those of their isolated wings, respectively. A 3D biplane wing obtained by an inverse-design method was applied to the body. The wing of this wing–body configuration achieves higher aerodynamic performance than the 2D flat-plate airfoil at sufficient lift conditions, which is the almost identical performance of 2D biplane airfoils.

[1]  桜井 健郎,et al.  H. W.Liepmann and A.Roshko: Elements of Gasdynamics John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1957, 439頁, 15×23cm, $11.00. , 1957 .

[2]  K. Nakahashi,et al.  Reordering of Hybrid Unstructured Grids for Lower-Upper Symmetric Gauss-Seidel Computations , 1998 .

[3]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Aerodynamic Design of Biplane Airfoils for Low Wave Drag Supersonic Flight , 2006 .

[4]  Daigo Maruyama,et al.  A Study in the Supersonic Biplane Utilizing Its Shock Wave Cancellation Effect , 2007 .

[5]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Some challenges of realistic flow simulations by unstructured grid CFD , 2003 .

[6]  Kazuhiro Kusunose,et al.  A Study of Busemann-type Biplane for Avoiding Choked Flow , 2007 .

[7]  K. Matsushima,et al.  NUMERICAL DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF A BIPLANE AS FUTURE SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT ------ REVISITING BUSEMANN’S , 2006 .

[8]  Raymond Brun,et al.  Elements of Gas Dynamics , 2009 .

[9]  Dennis M. Bushnell,et al.  Shock wave drag reduction , 2004 .

[10]  Daigo Maruyama,et al.  Aerodynamic characteristics of a two-dimensional supersonic biplane, covering its take-off to cruise conditions , 2009 .

[11]  A. Busemann,et al.  Aerodynamic lift at supersonic speeds , 1935 .

[12]  Daigo Maruyama,et al.  A Fundamental Study for the Development of Boomless Supersonic Transport Aircraft , 2006 .

[13]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Surface triangulation for polygonal models based on CAD data , 2002 .

[14]  Kazuhiro Kusunose,et al.  A Fundamental Study for Aerodynamic Characteristics of Supersonic Biplane Wing and Wing-Body Configurations , 2009 .

[15]  P. Spalart.  A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[16]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Unstructured Mesh Generation For Viscous Flow Computations , 2002, IMR.

[17]  D. Maruyama.  AERODYNAMIC DESIGN OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL BIPLANE WINGS FOR LOW WAVE-DRAG SUPERSONIC FLIGHT , 2008 .

[18]  Kazuhiro Nakahashi,et al.  Consideration at Off-Design Conditions of Supersonic Flows around Biplane Airfoils , 2007 .

[20]  W. E. Moeckel,et al.  Theoretical Aerodynamic Coefficients of Two-Dimensional Supersonic Biplanes , 1947 .