Association of ERBB Mutations With Clinical Outcomes of Afatinib- or Erlotinib-Treated Patients With Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Secondary Analysis of the LUX-Lung 8 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance Treatment choice for lung squamous cell carcinoma could be aided by identifying predictive biomarkers. Objective To assess whether patient outcomes in the LUX-Lung 8 trial were associated with ERBB gene family member aberrations in tumor specimens. Design, Setting, and Participants Ad hoc secondary analysis of the LUX-Lung 8 trial conducted at 183 centers in 23 countries from March 30, 2012, to January 30, 2014. Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV lung squamous cell carcinoma with progressive disease after 4 or more cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Tumor genetic analysis (TGA) was performed using next-generation sequencing in a cohort enriched for patients with progression-free survival (PFS) of more than 2 months. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression levels were assessed by immunohistochemistry in a separate cohort of patients from the LUX-Lung 8 population. Associations of PFS and overall survival (OS) with ERBB gene alterations and EGFR expression levels were assessed. This analysis was conducted from February 26, 2015, to June 12, 2017. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with afatinib dimaleate (40 mg/d; n = 398) or erlotinib hydrochloride (150 mg/d; n = 397). Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival, PFS, pooled and individual ERBB gene mutations, ERBB copy number alterations, and EGFR expression. Results Tumor specimens from 245 patients were eligible for next-generation sequencing (TGA subset: 132 patients treated with afatinib; 113 patients treated with erlotinib). In this population, outcomes were improved with afatinib vs erlotinib treatment (PFS: median, 3.5 vs 2.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92; P = .01; OS: median, 8.4 vs 6.6 months; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-1.05; P = .12). Of 245 patients in the TGA subset, 53 (21.6%) had tumors with 1 or more ERBB mutations. Among afatinib-treated patients, PFS (median, 4.9 vs 3.0 months; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.02; P = .06) and OS (median, 10.6 vs 8.1 months; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47-1.17; P = .21) were longer among those with ERBB mutation–positive disease than among those without. The presence of HER2 mutations was associated with favorable PFS and OS following afatinib vs erlotinib treatment. There was no apparent association between copy number alteration or EGFR expression level and outcome. Conclusions and Relevance Next-generation sequencing may help identify patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma who would derive additional benefit from treatment with afatinib. The role of ERBB mutations, particularly HER2 mutations, as predictive biomarkers for afatinib treatment in this setting warrants further evaluation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01523587

[1]  F. López-Ríos,et al.  Updated guidelines for predictive biomarker testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology , 2019, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[2]  Shun Lu,et al.  Long-term efficacy of afatinib in a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and multiple ERBB family aberrations: afatinib in ERBB+ lung squamous cell carcinoma , 2019, Anti-cancer drugs.

[3]  J. Subramanian,et al.  Emergence of ERBB2 Mutation as a Biomarker and an Actionable Target in Solid Cancers. , 2019, The oncologist.

[4]  Yi-long Wu,et al.  Emerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer , 2019, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[5]  A. Addeo,et al.  Next Generation Sequencing and Genetic Alterations in Squamous Cell Lung Carcinoma: Where Are We Today? , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[6]  K. Syrigos,et al.  Evaluation of the VeriStrat® serum protein test in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung treated with second-line afatinib or erlotinib in the phase III LUX-Lung 8 study. , 2017, Lung cancer.

[7]  Vamsidhar Velcheti,et al.  HER2 Transmembrane Domain (TMD) Mutations (V659/G660) That Stabilize Homo‐ and Heterodimerization Are Rare Oncogenic Drivers in Lung Adenocarcinoma That Respond to Afatinib , 2017, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[8]  Carlos Barrios,et al.  Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[9]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Yusuke Nakamura,et al.  Afatinib Activity in Platinum-Refractory Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients With ERBB Alterations. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[12]  Ron Bose,et al.  HER2 activating mutations are targets for colorectal cancer treatment. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[13]  K. Syrigos,et al.  Afatinib versus erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUX-Lung 8): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  C. Schumann,et al.  Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin alone as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (SQUIRE): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  Matteo Brunelli,et al.  Differential Activity of Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and MPDL3280A according to the Tumor Expression of Programmed Death-Ligand-1 (PD-L1): Sensitivity Analysis of Trials in Melanoma, Lung and Genitourinary Cancers , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  J. Canon,et al.  Phase II study of afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker, in demographically and genotypically defined lung adenocarcinoma. , 2015, Lung cancer.

[18]  Mingming Jia,et al.  COSMIC: exploring the world's knowledge of somatic mutations in human cancer , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Andreas Sashegyi,et al.  Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel for second-line treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer after disease progression on platinum-based therapy (REVEL): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[20]  Alex M. Fichtenholtz,et al.  Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  S. Peters,et al.  Lung cancer that harbors an HER2 mutation: epidemiologic characteristics and therapeutic perspectives. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer genes , 2014 .

[23]  Somasekar Seshagiri,et al.  Oncogenic ERBB3 mutations in human cancers. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[24]  Li Ding,et al.  Activating HER2 mutations in HER2 gene amplification negative breast cancer. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[25]  D De Ruysscher,et al.  Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers , 2012, Nature.

[27]  Wendy Winckler,et al.  Functional analysis of receptor tyrosine kinase mutations in lung cancer identifies oncogenic extracellular domain mutations of ERBB2 , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Gur Pines,et al.  The ERBB network: at last, cancer therapy meets systems biology , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[29]  David P. Davis,et al.  Diverse somatic mutation patterns and pathway alterations in human cancers. , 2010, Nature.

[30]  S Senan,et al.  Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2018, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[31]  A. V. López-Malpartida,et al.  Differential ErbB receptor expression and intracellular signaling activity in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. , 2009, Lung cancer.

[32]  Lesley Seymour,et al.  Erlotinib in lung cancer - molecular and clinical predictors of outcome. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Chan Zeng,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  F. Hirsch,et al.  HER2/neu expression in malignant lung tumors. , 2002, Seminars in oncology.

[35]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[36]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .

[37]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2013, JAMA.