Synthetic biology tools for programming gene expression without nutritional perturbations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A conditional gene expression system that is fast-acting, is tunable and achieves single-gene specificity was recently developed for yeast. A gene placed directly downstream of a modified GAL1 promoter containing six Zif268 binding sequences (with single nucleotide spacing) was shown to be selectively inducible in the presence of β-estradiol, so long as cells express the artificial transcription factor, Z3EV (a fusion of the Zif268 DNA binding domain, the ligand binding domain of the human estrogen receptor and viral protein 16). We show the strength of Z3EV-responsive promoters can be modified using straightforward design principles. By moving Zif268 binding sites toward the transcription start site, expression output can be nearly doubled. Despite the reported requirement of estrogen receptor dimerization for hormone-dependent activation, a single binding site suffices for target gene activation. Target gene expression levels correlate with promoter binding site copy number and we engineer a set of inducible promoter chassis with different input–output characteristics. Finally, the coupling between inducer identity and gene activation is flexible: the ligand specificity of Z3EV can be re-programmed to respond to a non-hormone small molecule with only five amino acid substitutions in the human estrogen receptor domain, which may prove useful for industrial applications.

[1]  L. Guarente,et al.  Distinctly regulated tandem upstream activation sites mediate catabolite repression of the CYC1 gene of S. cerevisiae , 1984, Cell.

[2]  G. Bellí,et al.  An activator/repressor dual system allows tight tetracycline-regulated gene expression in budding yeast. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  B. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  Directed Evolution of Human Estrogen Receptor Variants with Significantly Enhanced Androgen Specificity and Affinity* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Directed evolution of estrogen receptor proteins with altered ligand-binding specificities. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[5]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Directed evolution of specific receptor-ligand pairs for use in the creation of gene switches. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology , 2012, Microbial Cell Factories.

[7]  Benjamin L. Oakes,et al.  Rapid Synthesis and Screening of Chemically Activated Transcription Factors with GFP-based Reporters , 2013, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[8]  Zengyi Shao,et al.  DNA assembler, an in vivo genetic method for rapid construction of biochemical pathways , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  M. Johnston,et al.  Galactose as a gratuitous inducer of GAL gene expression in yeasts growing on glucose. , 1989, Gene.

[10]  D. Picard,et al.  Fusion of GAL4-VP16 to a steroid-binding domain provides a tool for gratuitous induction of galactose-responsive genes in yeast. , 1993, Gene.

[11]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[12]  Benjamin L. Oakes,et al.  Synthetic gene expression perturbation systems with rapid, tunable, single-gene specificity in yeast , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Karsten Weis,et al.  Dynamic profiling of mRNA turnover reveals gene-specific and system-wide regulation of mRNA decay , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Rational Diversification of a Promoter Providing Fine-Tuned Expression and Orthogonal Regulation for Synthetic Biology , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  Eran Segal,et al.  Measurements of the Impact of 3′ End Sequences on Gene Expression Reveal Wide Range and Sequence Dependent Effects , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  G. Roeder,et al.  The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S. cerevisiae Ensures Synapsis between Homologous Chromosomes , 1998, Cell.

[17]  Jed Dean,et al.  High-throughput, cost-effective verification of structural DNA assembly , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Fast-acting and Nearly Gratuitous Induction of Gene Expression and Protein Depletion in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Graduate Program in Quantitative and Computational Biology, And , 2022 .

[19]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Brenda J. Andrews,et al.  Functional Analysis With a Barcoder Yeast Gene Overexpression System , 2012, G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics.

[21]  Eran Segal,et al.  Manipulating nucleosome disfavoring sequences allows fine-tune regulation of gene expression in yeast , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[22]  N. M. Hollingsworth,et al.  HOP1: a yeast meiotic pairing gene. , 1989, Genetics.

[23]  Matthew J. Brauer,et al.  Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[24]  W. Tanner,et al.  Deletion of New Covalently Linked Cell Wall Glycoproteins Alters the Electrophoretic Mobility of Phosphorylated Wall Components of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  K. Davies,et al.  The DAN1 gene of S. cerevisiae is regulated in parallel with the hypoxic genes, but by a different mechanism. , 1997, Gene.

[26]  D. Botstein,et al.  Coordinated regulation of sulfur and phospholipid metabolism reflects the importance of methylation in the growth of yeast , 2011, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  A Synthetic Biology Framework for Programming Eukaryotic Transcription Functions , 2012, Cell.

[28]  D. Thiele,et al.  Copper ion inducible and repressible promoter systems in yeast. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[29]  Adam Frost,et al.  A Ribosome-Bound Quality Control Complex Triggers Degradation of Nascent Peptides and Signals Translation Stress , 2012, Cell.

[30]  D. Botstein,et al.  Plasmid construction by homologous recombination in yeast. , 1987, Gene.

[31]  J Craig Venter,et al.  One-step assembly in yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  David Botstein,et al.  Perturbation-based analysis and modeling of combinatorial regulation in the yeast sulfur assimilation pathway , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[33]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Directed evolution of orthogonal ligand specificity in a single scaffold. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[34]  M. Gerstein,et al.  The Transcriptional Landscape of the Yeast Genome Defined by RNA Sequencing , 2008, Science.

[35]  Eran Segal,et al.  Deciphering the rules by which 5′-UTR sequences affect protein expression in yeast , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Jie Rao,et al.  Control of estrogen receptor ligand binding by Hsp90 , 2000, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[37]  P. Pryciak,et al.  Membrane Localization of Scaffold Proteins Promotes Graded Signaling in the Yeast MAP Kinase Cascade , 2008, Current Biology.