It is shown in this paper that no stable equilibrium can be attained in an ecological community in which some r of the components are limited by less than r limiting factors. The limiting factors are thus put forward as those aspects of the niche crucial in the determination of whether species can coexist. For example, consider the following simple food web: Despite the similar positions occupied by the two prey species in this web, it is possible for them to coexist if each is limited by an independent combination of predation and resource limitation, since then two independent factors are serving to limit two species. On the other hand, if two species feed on distinct but superabundant food sources, but are limited by the same single predator, they cannot continue to coexist indefinitely. Thus these two species, although apparently filling distinct ecological niches, cannot survive together. In general, each species will increase if the predator becomes scarce, will decrease where it is abundant, and will have a characteristic threshold predator level at which it stabilizes. That species with the higher threshold level will be on the increase when the other is not, and will tend to replace the other in the community. If the two have comparable threshold values, which is certainly possible, any equilibrium reached between the two will be highly variable, and no stable equilibrium situation will result. This is not the same as dismissing this situation as "infinitely unlikely," which is not an acceptable argument in this case. Hutchinson's point of the preceding section vividly illustrates this. The results of this paper improve on existing results in three ways. First, they eliminate the restriction that all species are resource-limited, a restriction persistent in the literature. Second, the results relate in general to periodic equilibria rather than to constant equilibria. Third, the nature of the proof relates to the crucial question of the behavior of trajectories near the proposed equilibrium, and provides insight into the behavior of the system when there is an insufficient number of limiting factors.
[1]
J. Grinnell.
The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher
,
1917
.
[2]
Vito Volterra,et al.
Leçons sur la théorie mathématique de la lutte pour la vie
,
1931
.
[3]
Feller William,et al.
An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications
,
1950
.
[4]
S. Utida.
Interspecific Competition Between Two Species of Bean Weevil
,
1953
.
[5]
Seuss.
On Beyond Zebra
,
1955
.
[6]
A. J. Lotka.
Elements of mathematical biology
,
1956
.
[7]
P. W. Frank.
Coactions in Laboratory Populations of Two Species of Daphnia
,
1957
.
[8]
R. Macarthur,et al.
Population Ecology of Some Warblers of Northeastern Coniferous Forests
,
1958
.
[9]
G. Hardin.
The competitive exclusion principle.
,
1960,
Science.
[10]
L. Slobodkin.
Preliminary Ideas for a Predictive Theory of Ecology
,
1961,
The American Naturalist.
[11]
David Pimentel,et al.
Animal Population Regulation by the Genetic Feed-Back Mechanism
,
1961,
The American Naturalist.
[12]
T. Park.
Beetles, Competition, and Populations: An intricate ecological phenomenon is brought into the laboratory and studied as an experimental model.
,
1962,
Science.
[13]
R. Macarthur,et al.
COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT.
,
1964,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14]
A. Rescigno,et al.
On the competitive exclusion principle.
,
1965,
The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.
[15]
R. Paine.
Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity
,
1966,
The American Naturalist.
[16]
R. Macarthur,et al.
The Theory of Island Biogeography
,
1969
.
[17]
R. B. Root.
The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray Gnatcatcher
,
1967
.
[18]
R. Levins.
Evolution in Changing Environments
,
1968
.
[19]
R. Thom.
Topological models in biology
,
1969
.
[20]
A. Macfadyen,et al.
Animal Ecology: Aims and Methods
,
1970
.