论文信息 - How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment

How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment

Recent comprehensive data provided through the DAISIE project (www.europe-aliens.org) have facilitated the development of the first pan-European assessment of the impacts of alien plants, vertebrates, and invertebrates – in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments – on ecosystem services. There are 1094 species with documented ecological impacts and 1347 with economic impacts. The two taxonomic groups with the most species causing impacts are terrestrial invertebrates and terrestrial plants. The North Sea is the maritime region that suffers the most impacts. Across taxa and regions, ecological and economic impacts are highly correlated. Terrestrial invertebrates create greater economic impacts than ecological impacts, while the reverse is true for terrestrial plants. Alien species from all taxonomic groups affect “supporting”, “provisioning”, “regulating”, and “cultural” services and interfere with human well-being. Terrestrial vertebrates are responsible for the greatest range of impacts, and these are widely distributed across Europe. Here, we present a review of the financial costs, as the first step toward calculating an estimate of the economic consequences of alien species in Europe.

[1] D. Strayer,et al. Invasive bivalves in fresh waters: impacts from individuals to ecosystems and possible control strategies , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[2] Glenn Marion,et al. Accounting for uncertainty in colonisation times: a novel approach to modelling the spatio‐temporal dynamics of alien invasions using distribution data , 2012 .

[3] D. Strayer. Eight questions about invasions and ecosystem functioning. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[4] R. Richter,et al. How to account for habitat suitability in weed management programmes? , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[5] M. Zisenis. EU DAISIE Research Project: Wanted—Death Penalty to Keep Native Species Competitive? , 2012 .

[6] T. Romanuk,et al. A Meta-Analysis of Community Response Predictability to Anthropogenic Disturbances , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[7] R. Otfinowski,et al. Invasion or retreat? The fate of exotic invaders on the northern prairies, 40 years after cattle grazing , 2012, Plant Ecology.

[8] C. Ricotta,et al. Phylogenetic beta diversity of native and alien species in European urban floras , 2012 .

[9] I. Kühn,et al. Origin matters: widely distributed native and non-native species benefit from different functional traits. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[10] V. S. Daga,et al. Variations in the endemic fish assemblage of a global freshwater ecoregion: Associations with introduced species in cascading reservoirs , 2012 .

[11] J. Drake,et al. Bioeconomic forecasting of invasive species by ecological syndrome , 2012 .

[12] P. Hulme,et al. Alien and native plant life‐forms respond differently to human and climate pressures , 2012 .

[13] Jan Pergl,et al. A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment , 2012, Global Change Biology.

[14] Matej David,et al. A generic ballast water discharge assessment model as a decision supporting tool in ballast water management , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[15] Melodie A McGeoch,et al. Uncertainty in invasive alien species listing. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16] Andrew Macleod,et al. New protocols to assess the environmental impact of pests in the EPPO decision-support scheme for pest risk analysis* , 2012 .

[17] Relative roles of natural and anthropogenic drivers of watershed invasibility in riverine ecosystems , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[18] Antoine Guisan,et al. Climatic Niche Shifts Are Rare Among Terrestrial Plant Invaders , 2012, Science.

[19] R. Rauber,et al. Control measures for a recent invasion of Hieracium pilosella in Southern Patagonian rangelands. , 2012 .

[20] Helge Bruelheide,et al. The role of UV-B radiation in the invasion of Hieracium pilosella—A comparison of German and New Zealand plants , 2012 .

[21] Jan Suda,et al. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. , 2012, Annals of botany.

[22] Helen E. Roy,et al. Generic ecological impact assessments of alien species in Norway: a semi-quantitative set of criteria , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[23] Z. Baruch,et al. Plant invasions research in Latin America: fast track to a more focused agenda , 2012 .

[24] Jan Pergl,et al. When are eradication campaigns successful? A test of common assumptions , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[25] Franz Essl,et al. Review of risk assessment systems of IAS in Europe and introducing the German-Austrian Black List Information System (GABLIS). , 2011 .

[26] H. Müller-Schärer,et al. Prospects for biological control of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe: learning from the past , 2011 .

[27] P. Pyšek,et al. Potential phytotoxic and shading effects of invasive Fallopia (Polygonaceae) taxa on the germination of native dominant species , 2011 .