Optimization in Focus Identification

This chapter investigates which factors are involved in the identification of the focused expression with which a focus particle associates. If a hearer wishes to interpret a sentence containing a focus particle, one of the things she must do is identify the focused expression. Although we are concerned here with bound focus only (i.e., the focus with which a focus particle associates, in the terminology of Jackendoff, 1972), bound focus and free focus are traditionally considered to be essentially the same phenomenon. The dominant view seems to be that focus (bound or free) is an abstract feature on syntactic phrases which is marked by prosodic prominence.1 This abstract focus feature has certain effects either in semantics or in pragmatics, depending on the exact theoretical position. A grammaticalized account of focus such as the structured meaning approach (e.g., von Stechow, 1991; Krifka, 1991) puts much of focus into syntax and semantics. Degrammaticalized accounts of focus such as the alternative semantics approach of Rooth (1992) or the approach of von Fintel (1994), on the other hand, remove focus from the grammar and place it in pragmatics. Under a pragmatic approach, focus is assumed to signal the presence in the context of a certain kind of presupposition, to which focus particles might be anaphorically or presuppositionally related.

[1]  Regina Pallat Moorcroft,et al.  Directionality and Logical Form , 1996 .

[2]  Laurence R. Horn Exclusive Company: Only and the Dynamics of Vertical Inference , 1996, J. Semant..

[3]  David I. Beaver,et al.  The Proper Treatments of Focus Sensitivity , 2002 .

[4]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..

[5]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[6]  Mats Rooth A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[7]  E. Herburger What Counts: Focus and Quantification , 2000 .

[8]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[9]  Ekkehard König,et al.  The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective , 1991 .

[10]  H. D. Hoop Only a matter of context , 1995 .

[11]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Optimality Theoretic Semantics , 2001 .

[12]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .

[13]  Frans Zwarts,et al.  Some Remarks on Focus Adverbs , 1991, J. Semant..

[14]  B. Partee Topic, Focus and Quantification , 1991 .

[15]  R. Schwarzschild Why Some Foci Must Associate 1 , 1997 .

[16]  Roger Schwarzschild,et al.  GIVENNESS, AVOIDF AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ACCENT* , 1999 .

[17]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  The Asymmetry of Optimality Theoretic Syntax and Semantics , 2000, J. Semant..

[18]  A Prince,et al.  Optimality: From Neural Networks to Universal Grammar , 1997, Science.

[19]  Sjaak de Mey 'Only' as a Determiner and as a Generalized Quantifier , 1991, J. Semant..

[20]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[21]  Association Focus , 1999 .

[22]  E. Williams Blocking and anaphora , 1997 .

[23]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Always and Only: Why Not All Focus-Sensitive Operators Are Alike , 2003 .

[24]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[25]  Kai-Uwe Von Fintel,et al.  Restrictions on quantifier domains , 1994 .

[26]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Current Issues in the Theory of Focus Probleme der Fokustheorie , 1991 .