Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values

The whole point of a diagnostic test is to use it to make a diagnosis, so we need to know the probability that the test will give the correct diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity1 do not give us this information. Instead we must approach the data from the direction of the test results, using predictive values. Positive predictive value is the proportion of patients with positive test results who are correctly diagnosed. Negative predictive value is the proportion of patients with negative test results who are correctly diagnosed. Using the same data as in the previous note,1 we know that 231 of 263 patients with abnormal liver scans had abnormal pathology, giving the proportion of correct diagnoses as 231/263 = 0.88. …

[1]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity , 1994 .

[2]  C. Kirton,et al.  Emerging Standards for Diabetes Care from a City‐wide Primary Care Audit , 1994, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[3]  C. Humphrey,et al.  Developing role of medical audit advisory groups. , 1993, Quality in health care : QHC.

[4]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Auditing audits: the method of Oxfordshire Medical Audit Advisory Group. , 1991, BMJ.

[5]  R. Baker Audit and standards in new general practice. , 1991, BMJ.

[6]  F. Schellevis,et al.  The effects of peer review in general practice. , 1988, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.