Improving Functional Connectome Fingerprinting with Degree-Normalization

Functional connectivity quantifies the statistical dependencies between the activity of brain regions, measured using neuroimaging data such as functional MRI BOLD time series. The network representation of functional connectivity, called a Functional Connectome (FC), has been shown to contain an individual fingerprint allowing participants identification across consecutive testing sessions. Recently, researchers have focused on the extraction of these fingerprints, with potential applications in personalized medicine. Here, we show that a mathematical operation denominated degree-normalization can improve the extraction of FC fingerprints. Degree-normalization has the effect of reducing the excessive influence of strongly connected brain areas in the whole-brain network. We adopt the differential identifiability framework and apply it to both original and degree-normalized FCs of 409 individuals from the Human Connectome Project, in resting-state and 7 fMRI tasks. Our results indicate that degree-normalization systematically improves three fingerprinting metrics, namely differential identifiability, identification rate and matching rate. Moreover, the results related to the matching rate metric suggest that individual fingerprints are embedded in a low-dimensional space. The results suggest that low-dimensional functional fingerprints lie in part in weakly connected subnetworks of the brain, and that degree-normalization helps uncovering them. This work introduces a simple mathematical operation that could lead to significant improvements in future FCs fingerprinting studies.

[1]  Matthew Toews,et al.  Multi-modal brain fingerprinting: A manifold approximation based framework , 2017, NeuroImage.

[2]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[4]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Network Analysis of Intrinsic Functional Brain Connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Personalized Neuroscience: Common and Individual-Specific Features in Functional Brain Networks , 2018, Neuron.

[6]  D. Higham,et al.  A weighted communicability measure applied to complex brain networks , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  Alexander A. Chubykin,et al.  25 GEFF : Graph Embedding for Functional Fingerprinting , 2020 .

[8]  M. Breakspear,et al.  The connectomics of brain disorders , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  The quest for identifiability in human functional connectomes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Oluwasanmi Koyejo,et al.  Human cognition involves the dynamic integration of neural activity and neuromodulatory systems , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Lisa Byrge,et al.  High-accuracy individual identification using a “thin slice” of the functional connectome , 2019, Network Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Vogelstein,et al.  Removing the Reliability Bottleneck in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research to Achieve Clinical Utility. , 2021, JAMA psychiatry.

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Multimodal imaging-based therapeutic fingerprints for optimizing personalized interventions: Application to neurodegeneration , 2018, NeuroImage.

[15]  Polina Golland,et al.  BrainPrint: A discriminative characterization of brain morphology , 2015, NeuroImage.

[16]  Nora D. Volkow,et al.  Functional connectivity hubs in the human brain , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  Enrico Amico,et al.  The disengaging brain: Dynamic transitions from cognitive engagement and alcoholism risk , 2020, NeuroImage.

[18]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Connectivity and Brain Networks in Schizophrenia , 2010 .

[19]  Sreevalsan S. Menon,et al.  A Comparison of Static and Dynamic Functional Connectivities for Identifying Subjects and Biological Sex Using Intrinsic Individual Brain Connectivity , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Trait-like variants in human functional brain networks , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Yong He,et al.  Chronnectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting higher cognitive functions using dynamic brain connectivity patterns , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[22]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  Dynamic network participation of functional connectivity hubs assessed by resting-state fMRI , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  Uncovering multi-site identifiability based on resting-state functional connectomes , 2018, NeuroImage.

[25]  Leonardo Gutiérrez-Gómez,et al.  Stable biomarker identification for predicting schizophrenia in the human connectome , 2020, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[26]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[27]  Joseph Jaja,et al.  Comparing functional connectivity matrices: A geometry-aware approach applied to participant identification , 2019, NeuroImage.

[28]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Fiberprint: A subject fingerprint based on sparse code pooling for white matter fiber analysis , 2017, NeuroImage.

[29]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[30]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[31]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Dynamic fluctuations coincide with periods of high and low modularity in resting-state functional brain networks , 2015, NeuroImage.

[32]  Enrico Amico,et al.  GEFF: Graph embedding for functional fingerprinting , 2020, NeuroImage.

[33]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[34]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[35]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation , 2018, Neuron.

[36]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[37]  Saige Rutherford,et al.  Basic Units of Inter-Individual Variation in Resting State Connectomes , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Enrico Amico,et al.  Regularization of functional connectomes and its impact on geodesic distance and fingerprinting , 2020, 2003.05393.

[39]  Diana O. Svaldi,et al.  Optimizing Differential Identifiability Improves Connectome Predictive Modeling of Cognitive Deficits in Alzheimer\'s Disease , 2019 .

[40]  Saad Jbabdi,et al.  Connectivity Fingerprints: From Areal Descriptions to Abstract Spaces , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  The community structure of functional brain networks exhibits scale-specific patterns of inter- and intra-subject variability , 2019, NeuroImage.

[42]  Matthieu Gilson,et al.  Extracting orthogonal subject- and condition-specific signatures from fMRI data using whole-brain effective connectivity , 2018, NeuroImage.

[43]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  The Dynamics of Functional Brain Networks: Integrated Network States during Cognitive Task Performance , 2015, Neuron.

[44]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Modular Brain Networks. , 2016, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Identification of individual subjects on the basis of their brain anatomical features , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[46]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and disturbed functional connectivity in schizophrenia , 2006, Schizophrenia Research.

[47]  Michele Benzi,et al.  The Physics of Communicability in Complex Networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[48]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Dynamic fluctuations in global brain network topology characterize functional states during rest and behavior , 2015, 1511.02976.

[49]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  The modulation of neural gain facilitates a transition between functional segregation and integration in the brain , 2017 .

[50]  Jean-Charles Delvenne,et al.  Random Walks, Markov Processes and the Multiscale Modular Organization of Complex Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[51]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The modular organization of brain cortical connectivity across the human lifespan , 2020, NeuroImage.

[52]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[53]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Fundamentals of Brain Network Analysis , 2016 .

[54]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  An evaluation of the efficacy, reliability, and sensitivity of motion correction strategies for resting-state functional MRI , 2017 .

[55]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  The modulation of neural gain facilitates a transition between functional segregation and integration in the brain , 2017, bioRxiv.

[56]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.