Comparing the Potency of Chemicals with Multiple Modes of Action in Aquatic Toxicology: Acute Toxicity Due to Narcosis versus Reactive Toxicity of Acrylic Compounds

A series of acrylates and methacrylates was used to illustrate a strategy to compare the importance of two modes of action (MOA) and thereby identify the predominant cause of acute fish toxicity. Acrylic compounds are known to be Michael acceptors and may therefore react with glutathione (GSH), causing GSH-depletion in vivo (reactive mechanism). On the other hand, acrylates may also act by a nonspecific mechanism (narcosis). The following two, physiologically meaningful parameters were calculated in order to estimate the contribution of these two mechanisms to the overall acute toxicity:  (i) a lipid normalized body burden for narcosis and (ii) the potential degree of GSH depletion by chemical reactivity. The degree of GSH depletion was found to be related to the product of the reactivity toward GSH and the exposure concentration. This model was validated with four model compounds and an in vivo study. For both MOA, toxic ratios were calculated and compared for all chemicals in the series. The approach en...

[1]  A. V. van Wezel,et al.  Narcosis due to environmental pollutants in aquatic organisms: residue-based toxicity, mechanisms, and membrane burdens. , 1995, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[2]  I. Nimmo The glutathione S-transferase activity in the gills of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdnerii) , 1985 .

[3]  D. Roberts Acute Lethal Toxicity Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships for Electrophiles and Pro-Electrophiles: Mechanistic and Toxicokinetic Principles , 1988 .

[4]  J. Hermens,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative modelling of toxic effects of organophosphorous compounds to fish. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  D. J. Reed Glutathione: toxicological implications. , 1990, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[6]  H Greim,et al.  Assessment of structurally related chemicals: toxicity and ecotoxicity of acrylic acid and acrylic acid alkyl esters (acrylates), methacrylic acid and methacrylic acid alkyl esters (methacrylates). , 1995, Chemosphere.

[7]  K. Hashimoto,et al.  Biochemical studies on acrylamide, a neurotoxic agent. , 1970, Biochemical pharmacology.

[8]  R. L. Lipnick Base-line toxicity predicted by quantitative structure-activity relationships as a probe for molecular mechanism of toxicity , 1989 .

[9]  C. Russom,et al.  Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) , 1997 .

[10]  S. Belinsky,et al.  Mechanism of hepatotoxicity in periportal regions of the liver lobule due to allyl alcohol: studies on thiols and energy status. , 1986, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[11]  A. Casini,et al.  Liver glutathione depletion induced by bromobenzene, iodobenzene, and diethylmaleate poisoning and its relation to lipid peroxidation and necrosis. , 1985, The American journal of pathology.

[12]  M. Nendza,et al.  Testbattery for the assessment of aquatic toxicity , 1997 .

[13]  J. Hermens,et al.  A quantitative structure-activity relationship for the acute toxicity of some epoxy compounds to the guppy , 1988 .

[14]  J. Nichols,et al.  Physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling of three waterborne chloroethanes in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). , 1991, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[15]  K. Lindros,et al.  Allyl alcohol liver injury: suppression by ethanol and relation to transient glutathione depletion. , 1987, Pharmacology & toxicology.

[16]  R. Schwarzenbach,et al.  Environmental Organic Chemistry , 1993 .

[17]  R. Maronpot,et al.  Ethyl acrylate-induced gastric toxicity. III. Development and recovery of lesions. , 1986, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[18]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Fish acute toxicity syndromes and their use in the QSAR approach to hazard assessment. , 1987, Environmental health perspectives.

[19]  D. Mackay,et al.  ENHANCING ECOTOXICOLOGICAL MODELING AND ASSESSMENT , 1993 .

[20]  Ovanes Mekenyan,et al.  Quantum‐chemical Descriptors for Estimating the Acute Toxicity of Electrophiles to the Fathed minnow (Pimephales promelas): An Analysis Based on Molecular Mechanisms , 1996 .

[21]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Use of respiratory‐cardiovascular responses of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) in identifying acute toxicity syndromes in fish: Part 2. malathion, carbaryl, acrolein and benzaldehyde , 1987 .

[22]  Acute toxicity and behavioral effects of acrylates and methacrylates to juvenile fathead minnows , 1988, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[23]  S. Orrenius,et al.  Mechanism of allyl alcohol toxicity and protective effects of low-molecular-weight thiols studied with isolated rat hepatocytes. , 1985, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[24]  J. Hermens,et al.  Electrophiles and acute toxicity to fish. , 1990, Environmental health perspectives.

[25]  G. Witz,et al.  The reactivity of selected acrylate esters toward glutathione and deoxyribonucleosides in vitro: structure-activity relationships. , 1994, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[26]  J. Mckim,et al.  Dynamics of renal excretion of phenol and major metabolites in the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) , 1999 .

[27]  M E Andersen,et al.  Physiological model for tissue glutathione depletion and increased resynthesis after ethylene dichloride exposure. , 1988, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[28]  R. Maronpot,et al.  Ethyl acrylate-induced gastric toxicity. II. Structure-toxicity relationships and mechanism. , 1985, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[29]  Andreas P. Freidig,et al.  Quantitative structure-property relationships for the chemical reactivity of acrylates and methacrylates , 1999 .

[30]  T W Schultz,et al.  Comparison of Tetrahymena and Pimephales toxicity based on mechanism of action. , 1998, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[31]  S. Dyer,et al.  An LC50 vs time model for the aquatic toxicity of reactive and receptor-mediated compounds. consequences for bioconcentration kinetics and risk assessment , 1999 .

[32]  D W Potter,et al.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model to describe the oral dosing of rats with ethyl acrylate and its implications for risk assessment. , 1992, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[33]  D. Mackay,et al.  Interpreting aquatic toxicity QSARs: the significance of toxicant body residues at the pharmacologic endpoint. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[34]  R. Lipnick,et al.  A QSAR study of the acute toxicity of some industrial organic chemicals to goldfish. Narcosis, electrophile and proelectrophile mechanisms. , 1987, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[35]  Joseph S. Wall,et al.  Relative Nucleophilic Reactivities of Amino Groups and Mercaptide Ions in Addition Reactions with α,β-Unsaturated Compounds1,2 , 1965 .

[36]  Robert L. Lipnick,et al.  Comparison of fish toxicity screening data for 55 alcohols with the quantitative structure‐activity relationship predictions of minimum toxicity for nonreactive nonelectrolyte organic compounds , 1985 .

[37]  R. Lipnick Outliers: their origin and use in the classification of molecular mechanisms of toxicity. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.