The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction

Three experiments investigated the effects of information order and representativeness on schema abstraction in a category learning task. A set of category members, in which the variability and frequency of member types were correlated, was divided into four study samples. In the high-variance condition, each sample was representative of the allowable variation in the category and the frequency with which it occurred. In the low-variance condition, the initial study sample focused only on the most frequently occurring category members. Subsequent samples gradually introduced exemplars, and hence additional variance, from remaining member types. After the fourth study sample, all subjects in all conditions had seen the same category members. Experiment 1 revealed that transfer performance was better if subjects began with a low-variance sample and were gradually introduced to the allowable variation on subsequent samples than if they consistently saw representative samples. Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that this information-order effect may interact with learning mode: Subjects induced to be more analytic about the material performed better if their initial and subsequent samples were representative of the category variation.

[1]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Transmission of information concerning concepts through positive and negative instances. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  N. Anderson,et al.  Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  A. Reber Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[5]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Induction of category distributions: a framework for classification learning. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  S. Asch Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[7]  Donald Homa,et al.  Abstraction of ill-defined form. , 1978 .

[8]  G. Bower,et al.  Presolution dimensional shifts in concept identification: A test of the sampling with replacement axiom in all-or-none models ☆ , 1966 .

[9]  G. Bower,et al.  Storage and later recognition of exemplars of concepts , 1973 .

[10]  Anderson,et al.  LEVv The Effects of Category Generalizations and Instance Similarity on Schema Abstraction , 2022 .

[11]  D. Homa,et al.  Category Breadth and the Abstraction of Prototypical Information. , 1976 .

[12]  M. Levine Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Strategies and classification learning , 1981 .

[14]  J. Bransford,et al.  Abstraction of visual patterns. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  A. Reber Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. , 1976 .

[16]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[17]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A General Learning Theory and its Application to Schema Abstraction1 , 1979 .

[18]  D. Robbins,et al.  Role of distinctive features in the abstraction of related concepts. , 1975 .

[19]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[20]  Effects of directional and neutral category labels in bidimensional rule-learning problems , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[21]  P. G. Neumann An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[22]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  F. Hayes-Roth,et al.  Concept learning and the recognition and classification of exemplars , 1977 .