Family Surrogate Decision Making at the End of Life: Seeing them Through with Care and Respect

Family surrogate decision makers are pivotal in end-of-life decision-making processes. The author investigated decision-making experiences of 20 surrogates who assisted terminally ill family members for this grounded theory study. Findings describe a basic social process of Seeing Them Through With Care and Respect, during which surrogates continuously synthesized the core values of caring for their family member and respecting their family member’s autonomy. Surrogate narratives began with Learning the Diagnosis. The major categories of surrogate decision makers’ activities during the process were Standing With and Acting For the ill family member. Events reported in two gating categories, Brokering Information and Working With Family, facilitated or impeded decision making. A final category, Outcomes, reports consequences for the surrogate of having been a decision maker.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[2]  K. Cain,et al.  Physicians' and spouses' predictions of elderly patients' resuscitation preferences. , 1988, Journal of gerontology.

[3]  J. Ouslander,et al.  Health care decisions among elderly long-term care residents and their potential proxies. , 1989, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  C. Cassel,et al.  Treatment choices at the end of life: a comparison of decisions by older patients and their physician-selected proxies. , 1989, The Gerontologist.

[5]  K. Howe,et al.  An empirical study of proxy consent for elderly persons. , 1990, The Gerontologist.

[6]  D. Meier,et al.  Substituted judgment: how accurate are proxy predictions? , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  S. Yellen,et al.  Communication about Advance Directives: Are Patients Sharing Information with Physicians? , 1992, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[8]  J. Hare,et al.  Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decisions. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  T. Garrick,et al.  Myth of substituted judgment. Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable. , 1994, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  D. High Surrogate decision making. Who will make decisions for me when I can't? , 1994, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[11]  D. Sulmasy,et al.  More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. , 1994, The American journal of medicine.

[12]  V. Tilden,et al.  Decisions about life-sustaining treatment. Impact of physicians' behaviors on the family. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  M. Libbus,et al.  Congruence of decisions between patients and their potential surrogates about life-sustaining therapies. , 1995, Image--the journal of nursing scholarship.

[14]  S. Miles,et al.  Advance end-of-life treatment planning. A research review. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  S. Miles,et al.  Advance End-of-Life Treatment Planning , 1996 .

[16]  T. Schacker,et al.  Clinical and Epidemiologic Features of Primary HIV Infection , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  C. Lidz,et al.  Letting go: family willingness to forgo life support. , 1996, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[18]  J. Garrett,et al.  What Is Wrong With End‐of‐Life Care? Opinions of Bereaved Family Members , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[19]  J. Jacobson,et al.  Dialogue to Action: Lessons Learned from Some Family Members of Deceased Patients at an Interactive Program in Seven Utah Hospitals , 1997, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[20]  D. Sulmasy,et al.  The Accuracy of Substituted Judgments in Patients with Terminal Diagnoses , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  M. D. Gross What do patients express as their preferences in advance directives? , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[22]  D. Jacob,et al.  Family members' experiences with decision making for incompetent patients in the ICU: a qualitative study. , 1998, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[23]  W M Tierney,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Generated Reminders for Increasing Discussions about Advance Directives and Completion of Advance Directive Forms , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  P. Singer,et al.  Quality end-of-life care: patients' perspectives. , 1999, JAMA.

[25]  S. Pierce Improving end-of-life care: gathering suggestions from family members. , 1999, Nursing forum.

[26]  P. Singer,et al.  A new model of advance care planning: observations from people with HIV. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[27]  M. Brown,et al.  The Labor of Caregiving: A Theoretical Model of Caregiving During Potentially Fatal Illness , 1999, Qualitative health research.

[28]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[29]  Douglas K. Martin,et al.  Planning for the end of life , 2000, The Lancet.

[30]  D. Goldblatt A messy necessary end , 2001, Neurology.

[31]  R. Houts,et al.  Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[32]  PALLIATIVE CARE A Weak Link in the Chain of Civilized Life , 2001 .

[33]  M. Meeker,et al.  Constituting Advance Directives From the Perspective of People With Chronic Illnesses , 2005 .