Body-extension versus body-incorporation: Is there a need for a body-model?

[1]  G. Carruthers.  Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[2]  Manos Tsakiris,et al.  The role of the right temporo-parietal junction in maintaining a coherent sense of one's body , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  Psychologically induced cooling of a specific body part caused by the illusory ownership of an artificial counterpart , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Marjolein P. M. Kammers,et al.  What is embodiment? A psychometric approach , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Dynamic Size-Change of Peri-Hand Space Following Tool-Use: Determinants and Spatial Characteristics Revealed Through Cross-Modal Extinction , 2007, Cortex.

[6]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Right TPJ deactivation during visual search: functional significance and support for a filter hypothesis. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  J. Decety,et al.  The Role of the Right Temporoparietal Junction in Social Interaction: How Low-Level Computational Processes Contribute to Meta-Cognition , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[8]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[10]  R. Saxe,et al.  Making sense of another mind: The role of the right temporo-parietal junction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Evidence for Multiple, Distinct Representations of the Human Body , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  C. Murray,et al.  An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[16]  M. Botvinick.  Probing the Neural Basis of Body Ownership , 2004, Science.

[17]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  J. Danckert.  Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  C. Kennard,et al.  The anatomy of visual neglect. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach , 2003, Current Biology.

[22]  C. Spence,et al.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans , 2002, Cognition.

[23]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Feeling touches in someone else's hand , 2002, Neuroreport.

[24]  M S Graziano,et al.  Coding the location of the arm by sight. , 2000, Science.

[25]  A. Clark.  An embodied cognitive science? , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Hand–Mouth Coordination, Congenital Absence of Limb, and Evidence for Innate Body Schemas , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  B. Stiegler.  Technics and Time, 1 , 1998 .

[29]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[30]  S. Aglioti,et al.  The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[31]  P. Rochat,et al.  Intermodal Calibration of the Body in Early Infancy , 1997 .

[32]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[33]  Rachel Morgan,et al.  Spatial determinants in the perception of self-produced leg movements in 3- to 5-month-old infants. , 1995 .

[34]  R. Lewontin,et al.  Culture on the Brink: Ideologies of Technology , 1994 .

[35]  Maurice Merleau-Ponty,et al.  Phenomenology of Perception. , 1964 .

[36]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[37]  George Collins,et al.  The fault of Epimetheus , 1998 .

[38]  Richard Beardsworth,et al.  Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus , 1998 .

[39]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[40]  M. Bassolino,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Extended Multisensory Space in Blind Cane Users , 2022 .

[41]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.