On the performance bounds of motion-compensated deinterlacing

Abstract The terms ‘proscan up-conversion’ or ‘deinterlacing’ stand for algorithms for the conversion of interlaced image sequences into progressive format by interpolating the lines which are missing due to interlaced scanning. Although deinterlacing is already known to improve TV image quality, such techniques will become even more important in future. Firstly, standard interlaced image sequences will be increasingly processed and displayed on computer platforms and thus usually require progressive scanning and an increased temporal resolution. Secondly, the emerging market of light valve projection equipment demands high-quality proscan up-conversion since the image quality of these display techniques relies heavily on the light efficiency of non-interlaced scanning. By describing deinterlacing as a problem of linear prediction theory, this paper derives upper MSE performance bounds for these algorithms. Thus, a theoretical framework is provided which allows to analyse the effects of various parameters like motion vector inaccuracy, temporal integration and memory constraints on the efficiency of motion-compensated deinterlacing. It is, for example, shown that these algorithms can be very sensitive to motion vector inaccuracies especially if the image sequence is recorded with very short exposure time. Finally, it is briefly demonstrated that the presented analysis can easily be extended to the case of field- and frame-rate up-conversion of interlaced (‘100 Hz’) and non-interlaced image sequences.

[1]  P. Pirsch,et al.  Advances in picture coding , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Martin Botteck Motion vector based interpolation techniques for flicker-free TV reproduction , 1992 .

[3]  Bernd Girod,et al.  Motion-Compensating Field Interpolation From Interlaced And Non-Interlaced Grids , 1986, Other Conferences.

[4]  J. Bendat,et al.  Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures , 1971 .

[5]  Anil K. Jain Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[6]  Luc Vandendorpe,et al.  Motion-compensated conversion from interlaced to progressive formats , 1994, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[7]  S. Hartwig The influence of interlacing on source coding efficiency and motion estimation , 1994 .

[8]  A. Vindigni,et al.  A Highly Integrated Scanning Rate Converter for IQTV , 1994, IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics.

[9]  Bernd Girod,et al.  The Efficiency of Motion-Compensating Prediction for Hybrid Coding of Video Sequences , 1987, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[10]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[11]  I. Miller Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes , 1966 .

[12]  J. Redmond,et al.  International Broadcasting Convention , 1989 .

[13]  Gerard de Haan,et al.  An evolutionary architecture for motion-compensated 100 Hz television , 1995, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[14]  John W. Woods,et al.  Hierarchical motion-compensated deinterlacing , 1991, Other Conferences.