A Method for Mammographic Image Denoising Based on Hierarchical Correlations of the Coefficients of Wavelet Transforms

In this work the authors present an effective denoising method to attempt to reduce the noise in mammographic images. The method is based on using hierarchical correlation of the coefficients of discrete stationary wavelet transforms. The features of the proposed technique include iterative use of undecimated multi-directional wavelet transforms at adjacent scales. To validate the proposed method, computer simulations were conducted, followed by its applications to clinical mammograms. Mutual information originating from information theory was used as an evaluation measure in the present study. Moreover, we conducted a perceptual evaluation of the processed images obtained from the proposed method and other conventional methods for confirmation of the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The experimental results show that our proposed method has the potential to effectively reduce noise while maintaining high-frequency information of original images.

[1]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Mark J. Shensa,et al.  The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the a trous and Mallat algorithms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M. Masotti,et al.  Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: false positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features. , 2009, Medical physics.

[5]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms. , 2006, Radiology.

[6]  C. Kamath,et al.  Undecimated Wavelet Transforms for Image De-noising , 2002 .

[7]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The curvelet transform for image denoising , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  D. Donoho,et al.  Redundant Multiscale Transforms and Their Application for Morphological Component Separation , 2004 .

[10]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[11]  J. E. Fowler,et al.  The redundant discrete wavelet transform and additive noise , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  M. Elter,et al.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review. , 2009, Medical physics.

[14]  Arianna Mencattini,et al.  Mammographic Images Enhancement and Denoising for Breast Cancer Detection Using Dyadic Wavelet Processing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[15]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography. , 2011, Medical physics.

[16]  Mohamed-Jalal Fadili,et al.  The Undecimated Wavelet Decomposition and its Reconstruction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Chandrika Kamath,et al.  Denoising through wavelet shrinkage: an empirical study , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Detection of transients in 1/f noise with the undecimated discrete wavelet transform , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  Dennis M. Healy,et al.  Wavelet transform domain filters: a spatially selective noise filtration technique , 1994, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[20]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[21]  Salah Bourennane,et al.  Noise reduction on mammographic phantom images , 2006 .