A percolation model for the emergence of the Bitcoin Lightning Network

The Lightning Network is a so-called second-layer technology built on top of the Bitcoin blockchain to provide "off-chain" fast payment channels between users, which means that not all transactions are settled and stored on the main blockchain. In this paper, we model the emergence of the Lightning Network as a (bond) percolation process and we explore how the distributional properties of the volume and size of transactions per user may impact its feasibility. The agents are all able to reciprocally transfer Bitcoins using the main blockchain and also - if economically convenient - to open a channel on the Lightning Network and transact "off chain". We base our approach on fitness-dependent network models: as in real life, a Lightning channel is opened with a probability that depends on the "fitness" of the concurring nodes, which in turn depends on wealth and volume of transactions. The emergence of a connected component is studied numerically and analytically as a function of the parameters, and the phase transition separating regions in the phase space where the Lightning Network is sustainable or not is elucidated. We characterize the phase diagram determining the minimal volume of transactions that would make the Lightning Network sustainable for a given level of fees or, alternatively, the maximal cost the Lightning ecosystem may impose for a given average volume of transactions. The model includes parameters that could be in principle estimated from publicly available data once the evolution of the Lighting Network will have reached a stationary operable state, and is fairly robust against different choices of the distributions of parameters and fitness kernels.

[1]  Andreas M. Antonopoulos,et al.  Mastering Bitcoin: Unlocking Digital Crypto-Currencies , 2014 .

[2]  M. Marchesi,et al.  Using an artificial financial market for studying a cryptocurrency market , 2014, 1406.6496.

[3]  M E J Newman,et al.  Component sizes in networks with arbitrary degree distributions. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Neng Wang,et al.  Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation , 2020, The Review of Financial Studies.

[5]  C. Hafner,et al.  Sentiment-Induced Bubbles in the Cryptocurrency Market , 2019, Journal of Risk and Financial Management.

[6]  Young Bin Kim,et al.  Predicting Fluctuations in Cryptocurrency Transactions Based on User Comments and Replies , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Satoshi Nakamoto.  Bitcoin : A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System , 2009 .

[8]  Claudio J. Tessone,et al.  Network-based indicators of Bitcoin bubbles , 2018, ArXiv.

[9]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  Scale-free networks from varying vertex intrinsic fitness. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[11]  T. Aste.  Cryptocurrency market structure: connecting emotions and economics , 2019, Digital Finance.

[12]  Haroldo V. Ribeiro,et al.  Clustering patterns in efficiency and the coming-of-age of the cryptocurrency market , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Ferenc Beres,et al.  A Cryptoeconomic Traffic Analysis of Bitcoins Lightning Network , 2019, ArXiv.

[14]  Elaine Shi,et al.  On Scaling Decentralized Blockchains - (A Position Paper) , 2016, Financial Cryptography Workshops.

[15]  Pavlin Mavrodiev,et al.  The digital traces of bubbles: feedback cycles between socio-economic signals in the Bitcoin economy , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  T. Squartini,et al.  The evolving liaisons between the transaction networks of Bitcoin and its price dynamics , 2019, 1907.03577.

[17]  K Hoppe,et al.  Network growth model with intrinsic vertex fitness. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Silvia Bartolucci,et al.  A model of the optimal selection of crypto assets , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.

[19]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[20]  P. Ciaian,et al.  The economics of BitCoin price formation , 2014, 1405.4498.

[21]  D S Callaway,et al.  Network robustness and fragility: percolation on random graphs. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[22]  Florian Tschorsch,et al.  Discharged Payment Channels: Quantifying the Lightning Network's Resilience to Topology-Based Attacks , 2019, 2019 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW).

[23]  Cohen,et al.  Resilience of the internet to random breakdowns , 2000, Physical review letters.

[24]  Andrew Urquhart.  The Inefficiency of Bitcoin , 2016 .

[25]  K Hoppe,et al.  Percolation on fitness-dependent networks with heterogeneous resilience. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Feng Fu,et al.  Sentiment-Based Prediction of Alternative Cryptocurrency Price Fluctuations Using Gradient Boosting Tree Model , 2018, Front. Phys..

[27]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms , 2021, Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms.

[28]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  Vertex intrinsic fitness: how to produce arbitrary scale-free networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  John Nelson,et al.  Cryptocurrency Price Prediction Using Tweet Volumes and Sentiment Analysis , 2018 .

[30]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks , 2008 .

[31]  Zhang Zhe,et al.  A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[32]  Ladislav Kristoufek,et al.  BitCoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  Machine Learning the Cryptocurrency Market , 2018 .

[34]  Aaron Yelowitz,et al.  Characteristics of Bitcoin users: an analysis of Google search data , 2014 .

[35]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  Machine Learning the Cryptocurrency Market , 2018, Complex..

[36]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Blockchain inefficiency in the Bitcoin peers network , 2017, EPJ Data Science.

[37]  László Gulyás,et al.  Topological Analysis of Bitcoin's Lightning Network , 2019, MARBLE.

[38]  Benjamin Fabian,et al.  Analyzing the Bitcoin Network: The First Four Years , 2016, Future Internet.

[39]  István Csabai,et al.  Do the Rich Get Richer? An Empirical Analysis of the Bitcoin Transaction Network , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  Marco Ortu,et al.  The Butterfly “Affect”: impact of development practices on cryptocurrency prices , 2020, EPJ Data Science.

[41]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of the cryptocurrency market , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[42]  Christian Decker,et al.  Information propagation in the Bitcoin network , 2013, IEEE P2P 2013 Proceedings.

[43]  Simina Brânzei,et al.  How to Charge Lightning , 2017, ArXiv.

[44]  Stanislaw Drozdz,et al.  Signatures of the Crypto-Currency Market Decoupling from the Forex , 2019, Future Internet.

[45]  Ludovico Minati,et al.  Bitcoin market route to maturity? Evidence from return fluctuations, temporal correlations and multiscaling effects , 2018, Chaos.

[46]  N. Houy.  The Economics of Bitcoin Transaction Fees , 2014 .

[47]  Sergey N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Critical phenomena in complex networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[48]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[49]  G. B. A. Barab'asi.  Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks , 2000, cond-mat/0011029.

[50]  From Mining to Markets: The Evolution of Bitcoin Transaction Fees , 2017 .