Engineering Cross Resonance Interaction in Multi-modal Quantum Circuits.

Existing scalable superconducting quantum processors have only nearest-neighbor coupling. This leads to reduced circuit depth, requiring large series of gates to perform an arbitrary unitary operation in such systems. Recently, multi-modal devices have been demonstrated as a promising candidate for small quantum processor units. Always on longitudinal coupling in such circuits leads to implementation of native high fidelity multi-qubit gates. We propose an architecture using such devices as building blocks for a highly connected larger quantum circuit. To demonstrate a quantum operation between such blocks, a standard transmon is coupled to the multi-modal circuit using a 3D bus cavity giving rise to small exchange interaction between the transmon and one of the modes. We study the cross resonance interaction in such systems and characterize the entangling operation as well as the unitary imperfections and cross-talk as a function of device parameters. Finally, we tune up the cross resonance drive to implement multi-qubit gates in this architecture.

[1]  Jay M. Gambetta,et al.  Process verification of two-qubit quantum gates by randomized benchmarking , 2012, 1210.7011.

[2]  A. Ranadive,et al.  Implementation of pairwise longitudinal coupling in a three-qubit superconducting circuit , 2016, 1610.07915.

[3]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of Fault-Tolerant State Preparation with Superconducting Qubits. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[4]  B. Vlastakis,et al.  Calibration of a Cross-Resonance Two-Qubit Gate Between Directly Coupled Transmons , 2019, Physical Review Applied.

[5]  Alexander N. Korotkov,et al.  Operation and intrinsic error budget of a two-qubit cross-resonance gate , 2019, Physical Review A.

[6]  V. Manucharyan,et al.  High-Coherence Fluxonium Qubit , 2018, Physical Review X.

[7]  Blake R. Johnson,et al.  Simple all-microwave entangling gate for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[8]  Alexandre Blais,et al.  Superconducting qubit with Purcell protection and tunable coupling. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[9]  Maika Takita,et al.  Demonstration of Weight-Four Parity Measurements in the Surface Code Architecture. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[10]  Travis S. Humble,et al.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.

[11]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets , 2017, Nature.

[12]  A. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Multimode superconducting circuits for realizing strongly coupled multiqubit processor units , 2017, Physical Review A.

[13]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of a Resonator-Induced Phase Gate in a Multiqubit Circuit-QED System. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[14]  C. K. Andersen,et al.  Rapid High-fidelity Multiplexed Readout of Superconducting Qubits , 2018, Physical Review Applied.

[15]  James S. Clarke,et al.  Impact of qubit connectivity on quantum algorithm performance , 2018, Quantum Science and Technology.

[16]  H Neven,et al.  A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits , 2017, Science.

[17]  M. Reed Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Qubits , 2013, 1311.6759.

[18]  John Preskill,et al.  Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , 2018, Quantum.

[19]  Chad Rigetti,et al.  Fully microwave-tunable universal gates in superconducting qubits with linear couplings and fixed transition frequencies , 2010 .

[20]  Liang Jiang,et al.  Quantum memory with millisecond coherence in circuit QED , 2015, 1508.05882.

[21]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate , 2016, 1603.04821.

[22]  S. Girvin,et al.  Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box , 2007, cond-mat/0703002.

[23]  M Steffen,et al.  Efficient measurement of quantum gate error by interleaved randomized benchmarking. , 2012, Physical review letters.