The Effect of Sourcing Policies on a Supplier's Sustainable Practices

Consumers today increasingly care about the process characteristics of the supply chain that created their product, such as the environmental impact of the processes. To meet this growing demand for sustainably produced products, firm must be able to source sustainably produced parts from their suppliers. In this paper, we analyze when and how buyers (manufacturers or retailers) can use sourcing policies to influence their suppliers to adopt sustainable processes that meet certain sustainability criteria. We study two sustainable sourcing policies commonly observed in practice, which influence supplier process decisions by committing to offer sustainable products. Under a Sustainable Preferred sourcing policy, a buyer commits to offering a sustainable product if she can source sustainably produced parts from the supplier, but otherwise will offer a conventional product. In contrast, under a Sustainable Required sourcing policy, the buyer will only offer a sustainable product, and therefore will only source from the supplier if he has adopted a sustainable process. We find that both the Preferred and Required policies can deter the supplier from switching to a sustainable process when the premium for the sustainable product is high. Moreover, the buyer can actually benefit from using the Preferred policy to deter the supplier. The Required policy can induce the supplier to switch but only when the premium for the sustainable product is low. However, the buyer may still benefit from using the Required policy to induce switching. We also consider the effect of supplier competition and show that both the Preferred and Required policies can deter or induce the supplier from switching to a sustainable process. However, the buyer never finds it beneficial to deter a supplier in the presence of supplier competition, and will only use a sustainable sourcing policy to induce switching.

[1]  Volodymyr Babich,et al.  Managing Opportunistic Supplier Product Adulteration: Deferred Payments, Inspection, and Combined Mechanisms. Extended Technical Report , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[2]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Households' Willingness to Pay for “Green” Goods: Evidence from Patagonia's Introduction of Organic Cotton Sportswear , 2009 .

[3]  Gal Raz,et al.  Collaborate or Compete: Examining Manufacturers' Replacement Strategies for a Substance of Concern , 2017 .

[4]  Ananth V. Iyer,et al.  An Analysis of Recycled Content Claims Under Demand Benefit and Supply Uncertainty , 2016 .

[5]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  Shared-Savings Contracts for Indirect Materials in Supply Chains: Channel Profits and Environmental Impacts , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Do Consumers Care about Ethics? Willingness to Pay for Fair‐Trade Coffee , 2005 .

[7]  Erica L. Plambeck,et al.  Supplier Evasion of a Buyer's Audit: Implications for Motivating Supplier Social and Environmental Responsibility , 2016, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[8]  Deishin Lee,et al.  Cradle-to-Cradle Design at Herman Miller: Moving Toward Environmental Sustainability , 2008 .

[9]  Wei Shi Lim,et al.  Producer-Supplier Contracts with Incomplete Information , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[10]  John W. Maxwell,et al.  Label Confusion: The Groucho Effect of Uncertain Standards , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[11]  John V. Gray,et al.  Inter‐organizational Quality Management: The Use of Contractual Incentives and Monitoring Mechanisms with Outsourced Manufacturing , 2013 .

[12]  Gary H. Chao,et al.  Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Cuihong Li,et al.  Sourcing for Supplier Effort and Competition: Design of the Supply Base and Pricing Mechanism , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses , 2005 .

[15]  C. Dimitri,et al.  The Role of Contracts in the Organic Supply Chain: 2004-2007 , 2010 .

[16]  Charles J. Corbett,et al.  Optimal shared-savings contracts in supply chains: Linear contracts and double moral hazard , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Tim Kraft,et al.  Replacement Decisions for Potentially Hazardous Substances , 2012 .

[18]  Michael K. Lim,et al.  The Effects of Ecolabels and Environmental Regulations on Green Product Development , 2016 .

[19]  Ying-Ju Chen,et al.  Supplier Certification and Quality Investment in Supply Chains , 2013 .

[20]  Yifan Xu,et al.  Competitive and Collaborative Quality and Warranty Management in Supply Chains , 2012 .

[21]  Pavel Castka,et al.  Governance of Eco-Labels: Expert Opinion and Media Coverage , 2014, Journal of Business Ethics.

[22]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Responsible Sourcing in Supply Chains , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Li Chen,et al.  Sourcing Under Supplier Responsibility Risk: The Effects of Certification, Audit, and Contingency Payment , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Chung-Chi Hsieh,et al.  Quality investment and inspection policy in a supplier-manufacturer supply chain , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..