Accuracy of Sentinel-1 PSI and SBAS InSAR Displacement Velocities against GNSS and Geodetic Leveling Monitoring Data

Correct use of multi-temporal Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) datasets to complement geodetic surveying for geo-hazard applications requires rigorous assessment of their precision and accuracy. Published inter-comparisons are mostly limited to ground displacement estimates obtained from different algorithms belonging to the same family of InSAR approaches, either Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) or Small BAseline Subset (SBAS); and accuracy assessments are mainly focused on vertical displacements or based on few Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) or geodetic leveling points. To fill this demonstration gap, two years of Sentinel-1 SAR ascending and descending mode data are processed with both PSI and SBAS consolidated algorithms to extract vertical and horizontal displacement velocity datasets, whose accuracy is then assessed against a wealth of contextual geodetic data. These include permanent GNSS records, static GNSS benchmark repositioning, and geodetic leveling monitoring data that the National Institute of Statistics, Geography, and Informatics (INEGI) of Mexico collected in 2014−2016 in the Aguascalientes Valley, where structurally-controlled land subsidence exhibits fast vertical rates (up to −150 mm/year) and a non-negligible east-west component (up to ±30 mm/year). Despite the temporal constraint of the data selected, the PSI-SBAS inter-comparison reveals standard deviation of 6 mm/year and 4 mm/year for the vertical and east-west rate differences, respectively, thus reassuring about the similarity between the two types of InSAR outputs. Accuracy assessment shows that the standard deviations in vertical velocity differences are 9−10 mm/year against GNSS benchmarks, and 8 mm/year against leveling data. Relative errors are below 20% for any locations subsiding faster than −15 mm/year. Differences in east-west velocity estimates against GNSS are on average −0.1 mm/year for PSI and +0.2 mm/year for SBAS, with standard deviations of 8 mm/year. When discrepancies are found between InSAR and geodetic data, these mostly occur at benchmarks located in proximity to the main normal faults, thus falling within the same SBAS ground pixel or closer to the same PSI target, regardless of whether they are in the footwall or hanging wall of the fault. Establishing new benchmarks at higher distances from the fault traces or exploiting higher resolution SAR scenes and/or InSAR datasets may improve the detection of the benchmarks and thus consolidate the statistics of the InSAR accuracy assessments.

[1]  A. Hooper,et al.  Recent advances in SAR interferometry time series analysis for measuring crustal deformation , 2012 .

[2]  M. Rossi,et al.  Mapping the global threat of land subsidence , 2020, Science.

[3]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Landslide mapping and monitoring by using radar and optical remote sensing: examples from the EC-FP7 project SAFER , 2016 .

[4]  J. Saastamoinen Atmospheric Correction for the Troposphere and Stratosphere in Radio Ranging Satellites , 2013 .

[5]  Daniele Perissin,et al.  remotIO: A Sentinel-1 Multi-Temporal InSAR Infrastructure Monitoring Service with Automatic Updates and Data Mining Capabilities , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Fabiana Calò,et al.  A Review of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture RADAR (InSAR) Multi-Track Approaches for the Retrieval of Earth’s Surface Displacements , 2017 .

[7]  Shimon Wdowinski,et al.  Application of InSAR and Gravimetry for Land Subsidence Hazard Zoning in Aguascalientes, Mexico , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[8]  A. Rucci,et al.  Can we use surface uplift data for reservoir performance monitoring? A case study from In Salah, Algeria , 2018, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control.

[9]  Antonio Pepe,et al.  Multi-Temporal Small Baseline Interferometric SAR Algorithms: Error Budget and Theoretical Performance , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[10]  J. Galetzka,et al.  TLALOCNet: A continuous GPS-met backbone in Mexico for seismotectonic and atmospheric research , 2018 .

[11]  Y. Morishita Nationwide urban ground deformation monitoring in Japan using Sentinel-1 LiCSAR products and LiCSBAS , 2021, Progress in Earth and Planetary Science.

[12]  J. J. Gómez Geología preliminar del Graben de Aguascalientes , 1989 .

[13]  Francesca Cigna,et al.  The relationship between intermittent coherence and precision of ISBAS InSAR ground motion velocities: ERS-1/2 case studies in the UK , 2017 .

[14]  S. Yalvaç Validating InSAR-SBAS results by means of different GNSS analysis techniques in medium- and high-grade deformation areas , 2020, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[15]  Xin Zhou,et al.  GOM20: A Stable Geodetic Reference Frame for Subsidence, Faulting, and Sea-Level Rise Studies along the Coast of the Gulf of Mexico , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Deodato Tapete,et al.  Sentinel-1 Big Data Processing with P-SBAS InSAR in the Geohazards Exploitation Platform: An Experiment on Coastal Land Subsidence and Landslides in Italy , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[17]  D. Tapete,et al.  Satellite InSAR survey of structurally-controlled land subsidence due to groundwater exploitation in the Aguascalientes Valley, Mexico , 2021 .

[18]  Deodato Tapete,et al.  Wide-Area InSAR Survey of Surface Deformation in Urban Areas and Geothermal Fields in the Eastern Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, Mexico , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[19]  J. A. Ortiz-Lozano,et al.  Land subsidence and ground failure associated to groundwater exploitation in the Aguascalientes Valley, México , 2013 .

[20]  Núria Devanthéry,et al.  Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: A review , 2016 .

[21]  Thomas Fuhrmann,et al.  Resolving Three-Dimensional Surface Motion with InSAR: Constraints from Multi-Geometry Data Fusion , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[22]  Luke Bateson,et al.  Validation and intercomparison of Persistent Scatterers Interferometry: PSIC4 project results , 2009 .

[23]  Chao Wang,et al.  Multi-Temporal InSAR Parallel Processing for Sentinel-1 Large-Scale Surface Deformation Mapping , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[24]  Andre Cahyadi Kalia,et al.  A Copernicus downstream-service for the nationwide monitoring of surface displacements in Germany , 2017 .

[25]  Michele Manunta,et al.  Automatic Generation of Sentinel-1 Continental Scale DInSAR Deformation Time Series through an Extended P-SBAS Processing Pipeline in a Cloud Computing Environment , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Generation of a consistent absolute phase-center correction model for GPS receiver and satellite antennas , 2007 .

[27]  Z. Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2014 plate motion model , 2017 .

[28]  B. Ataie‐Ashtiani,et al.  Land subsidence: A global challenge. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  T. Wright,et al.  Statistical comparison of InSAR tropospheric correction techniques , 2015 .

[30]  Alfonso Rivera,et al.  Land subsidence in major cities of Central Mexico: Interpreting InSAR-derived land subsidence mapping with hydrogeological data , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[31]  D. Tapete,et al.  Present-day land subsidence rates, surface faulting hazard and risk in Mexico City with 2014–2020 Sentinel-1 IW InSAR , 2020 .

[32]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  The Evolution of Wide-Area DInSAR: From Regional and National Services to the European Ground Motion Service , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Continuous, semi-automatic monitoring of ground deformation using Sentinel-1 satellites , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Michael Eineder,et al.  Practical persistent scatterer processing validation in the course of the Terrafirma project , 2007 .

[35]  A. Novellino,et al.  Benchmarking and inter-comparison of Sentinel-1 InSAR velocities and time series , 2021 .

[36]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[37]  Fabio Bovenga,et al.  Using C/X-band SAR interferometry and GNSS measurements for the Assisi landslide analysis , 2013 .

[38]  Malcolm Davidson,et al.  GMES Sentinel-1 mission , 2012 .

[39]  L. Mervart,et al.  Extended orbit modeling techniques at the CODE processing center of the international GPS service for geodynamics (IGS): theory and initial results. , 1994 .

[40]  Riccardo Lanari,et al.  A quantitative assessment of the SBAS algorithm performance for surface deformation retrieval from DInSAR data , 2006 .