Assessment and Control of Spacecraft Charging Risks on the International Space Station

Electrical interactions between the F2 region ionospheric plasma and the 160V photovoltaic (PV) electrical power system on the International Space Station (ISS) can produce floating potentials (FP) on the ISS conducting structure of greater magnitude than are usually observed on spacecraft in low-Earth orbit. Flight through the geomagnetic field also causes magnetic induction charging of ISS conducting structure. Charging processes resulting from interaction of ISS with auroral electrons may also contribute to charging albeit rarely. The magnitude and frequency of occurrence of possibly hazardous charging events depends on the ISS assembly stage (six more 160V PV arrays will be added to ISS), ISS flight configuration, ISS position (latitude and longitude), and the natural variability in the ionospheric flight environment. At present, ISS is equipped with two plasma contactors designed to control ISS FP to within 40 volts of the ambient F2 plasma. The negative-polarity grounding scheme utilized in the ISS 160V power system leads, naturally, to negative values of ISS FP. A negative ISS structural FP leads to application of electrostatic fields across the dielectrics that separate conducting structure from the ambient F2 plasma, thereby enabling dielectric breakdown and arcing. Degradation of some thermal control coatings and noise in electrical systems can result. Continued review and evaluation of the putative charging hazards, as required by the ISS Program Office, revealed that ISS charging could produce a risk of electric shock to the ISS crew during extra vehicular activity. ISS charging risks are being evaluated in ongoing ISS charging measurements and analysis campaigns. The results of ISS charging measurements are combined with a recently developed detailed model of the ISS charging process and an extensive analysis of historical ionospheric variability data, to assess ISS charging risks using Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) methods. The PRA analysis (estimated frequency of occurrence and severity of the charging hazards) are then used to select the hazard control strategy that provides the best overall safety and mission success environment for ISS and the ISS crew. This paper presents: 1) a summary of ISS spacecraft charging analysis, measurements, observations made to date, 2) plans for future ISS spacecraft charging measurement campaigns, and 3) a detailed discussion of the PRA strategy used to assess ISS spacecraft charging risks and select charging hazard control strategies

[1]  L. F. Neergaard,et al.  High Latitude Plasma Electrodynamics and Spacecraft Charging in Low Earth Orbit , 2000 .

[2]  D. Ferguson,et al.  The Conductor-Dielectric Junctions in a Low Density Plasma , 1999 .

[3]  L. F. Neergaard,et al.  Specification of the ISS Plasma Environment Variability , 2002 .

[4]  H. Garrett,et al.  Design guidelines for assessing and controlling spacecraft charging effects , 1985 .

[5]  C. V. Doreswamy,et al.  Electrical Breakdown of Anodized Structures in a Low Earth Orbital Environmental , 1999 .

[6]  Hitoshi Kuninaka,et al.  Arcing rates for High Voltage Solar Arrays - Theory, experiment, and predictions , 1992 .

[7]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Data analysis and model comparison for Solar Array Module Plasma Interactions Experiment , 1996 .

[8]  David B. Snyder,et al.  Dynamic interactions between ionospheric plasma and spacecraft , 1995 .

[9]  B. J. Anderson,et al.  Natural Orbital Environment Guidelines for Use in Aerospace Vehicle Development. , 1994 .

[10]  H.-C. Yeh,et al.  High-level spacecraft charging in the low-altitude polar auroral environment , 1985 .

[11]  I. Katz,et al.  The plasma environment of the International Space Station in the austral summer auroral zone inferred from plasma contactor data , 2002 .

[12]  Dale C. Ferguson,et al.  First results from the Floating Potential Probe (FPP) on the International Space Station , 2001 .

[13]  ISS Plasma Interaction: Measurements and Modeling , 2004 .

[14]  Rebecca Chaky,et al.  The ISS plasma contactor , 1996 .

[15]  N. W. Spencer,et al.  Langmuir probe measurements in the ionosphere , 1959 .

[16]  Analysis of Freja Charging Events : Statistical Occurrence of Charging Events , 1999 .

[17]  D. Ferguson,et al.  In-space measurement of electron current collection by Space Station solar arrays , 1995 .

[19]  D. Cooke Simulation of an auroral charging anomaly on the DMSP satellite , 1998 .

[20]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  A review of plasma interactions with spacecraft in low earth orbit , 1995 .

[21]  A. Jursa,et al.  Handbook of geophysics and the space environment , 1985 .

[22]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Space Station Cathode Design, Performance, and Operating Specifications , 1998 .

[23]  I. Katz,et al.  Electrical Breakdown Currents on Large Spacecraft in Low Earth Orbit , 1994 .

[24]  Todd Schneider,et al.  Minimum Arc Threshold Voltage Experiments on Extravehicular Mobility Unit Samples , 2002 .

[25]  Hitoshi Kuninaka,et al.  The arcing rate for a High Voltage Solar Array - Theory, experiment and predictions , 1992 .