Gender and status effects in student e-mails to staff

This study aimed to examine gender and status effects in the kind of e-mails used to manage course administrative issues in an educational setting. Students were asked to respond to an e-mail presented as being from a member of staff, informing them of failure to submit coursework and asking for an explanation to be provided. The sex and status of the sender were varied. The data showed both gender and status effects. The men more frequently adopted an assertive stance, while the women more frequently referred to work-related issues in a conciliatory way. A number of features of the e-mails varied according to the sex of the .participant, and the status and sex of the sender. There was evidence of a greater influence of status in features of the replies from the men, although the effect of this varied according to the sex of the sender. In addition, accommodation to the gender-stereotypes of the senders was evident in features of the data from both men and women.

[1]  Vic Lally,et al.  Gender differences in an on-line learning environment , 1999, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Sex stereotypes and social judgment , 1980 .

[3]  Naomi S. Baron.  Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of Email. , 1998 .

[4]  Paul P. Freddolino,et al.  Enhancing Computer-Mediated Teaching through Interactivity: The Second Iteration of a World Wide Web-Based Graduate Social Work Course , 2000 .

[5]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: general principles and differences due to culture and gender. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Anne Locksley,et al.  Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base-rate fallacy , 1982 .

[7]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[8]  D. Rubin,et al.  Enacting Gender Identity in Written Discourse , 2001 .

[9]  R. Thomson,et al.  Predicting gender from electronic discourse. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[10]  Letter Writing Differences: Relative Status Effects , 1981 .

[11]  S. Murray.  You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation , 1992 .

[12]  Ann Colley,et al.  Gender-Linked Differences in the Style and Content of E-Mails to Friends , 2002 .

[13]  Donald L. Rubin,et al.  Gender-Typical Style in Written Language. , 1992 .

[14]  Ann Colley,et al.  Style and Content in E-Mails and Letters to Male and Female Friends , 2004 .

[15]  Fern L. Johnson,et al.  Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends , 1983 .

[16]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Stereotypes and social judgements , 1989 .

[17]  Linda C. Petty,et al.  Using internet resources in a research methods course , 1997 .

[18]  Dorit Maor,et al.  Quality of Students’ Communicative Strategies Delivered Through Computer-Mediated Communications , 2004 .