Pathological findings in cumulative irritation induced by SLS and croton oil in hairless mice

It is known that the pathological features of acute irritant contact dermatitis are specific according to the irritant. However, in chronic irritant contact dermatitis, it is not clear whether specific patterns exist. To investigate whether the specific pathology of acute irritant contact dermatitis is sustained in chronic irritant contact dermatitis, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and croton oil were applied 3× a week for 2 weeks on the dorsal skin of hairless mice using Finn Chambers. The pathologic changes induced by irritants at various concentrations were evaluated using H&E and Luna’s staining, as well as immunohistochemistry for 5‐bromo‐2‐deoxyuridine (BrdU), keratin 6 and loricrin. Our results showed that epidermal hyperplasia and inflammatory infiltration were relatively marked in the groups treated with higher concentrations of irritants. These features were more prominent in the 1% croton oil treated group than in the 0.25% SLS treated group. However, lower concentrations of irritants resulted in very similar histological changes, characterized by epidermal hyperplasia with minimal inflammatory infiltration, irrespective of the chemical. Our results suggest that the histological responses to irritants vary with concentration in cumulative irritation, as in acute irritation, but repetitive mild irritation may evoke common histological changes, characterized by epidermal hyperplasia with minimal inflammatory infiltration, irrespective of the chemical used.

[1]  T. Polefka,et al.  The effects of prolonged use of surfactants on the skin of normal and photo‐exposed hairless mice * , 1998, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  A. Kligman,et al.  A hairless mouse model for assessing the chronic toxicity of topically applied chemicals. , 1998, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  J. Jensen,et al.  Expression of epidermal keratins and the cornified envelope protein involucrin is influenced by permeability barrier disruption. , 1998, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  E. Berardesca,et al.  The modulation of skin irritation , 1994, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  C. Willis,et al.  Differential effects of structurally unrelated chemical irritants on the density of proliferating keratinocytes in 48 h patch test reactions. , 1992, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[6]  B. Kirkhus,et al.  A comparison between the epidermal regenerative responses provoked by a skin irritant and a tumor promoter using anti-BrdUrd/DNA flow cytometry. , 1991, Carcinogenesis.

[7]  C. Willis,et al.  Epidermal damage induced by irritants in man: a light and electron microscopic study. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[8]  C. Coviello,et al.  Histological changes in rabbits after application of medicaments and cosmetic bases (III) , 1984, Contact dermatitis.

[9]  K. Malten Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis , 1981, Contact Dermatitis.

[10]  K. Andersen,et al.  Cumulative irritancy in the guinea Pig from low grade irritant vehicles and the angry skin syndrome , 1980, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  C. Coviello,et al.  Histological changes in rabbits after application of medicaments and cosmetic bases , 1979, Contact dermatitis.

[12]  C. Coviello,et al.  Histological changes in rabbits after application of medicaments and cosmetic bases. II , 1979, Contact dermatitis.

[13]  H I Maibach,et al.  The rabbit as a model for evaluating skin irritants: a comparison of results obtained on animals and man using repeated skin exposures. , 1975, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[14]  L. Kligman Luna's technique. A beautiful stain for elastin. , 1981, The American Journal of dermatopathology.