An evaluation of the effect of ertapenem in rats with sepsis created by cecal ligation and puncture.

BACKGROUND Intra-abdominal adhesions are still a major problem which is expected to be reduced by the provision of bacterial decontamination. Various antibiotics have been used to prevent the formation of adhesion in the septic abdomen. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of ertapenem in sepsis of rats induced by cecal ligation and puncture. METHODS Twenty-eight Wistar rats were divided into four groups randomly. In all groups, bacterial peritonitis was created by cecal ligation and puncture method. Group 1 was considered as sham group. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were given, respectively, saline, a single dose of ertapenem and a dose of ertapenem intraperitoneally every day. Intra-abdominal adhesions were assessed seven days after surgery by histopathological examination. Microbiological examination was performed through the ascites obtained. TNF-α was measured from blood taken from rats. RESULTS Adhesion score decreased significantly by the application of ertapenem (p<0.001) and fibrosis scores were found to be significantly lower (p=0.005). Among all groups, the relationship between the decrease in the number of colonies and antibiotics application was not statistically significant (p=0.109). No statistically significant difference was found between the group given a single dose of ertapenem and the group given multiple ertapenem (p=1). CONCLUSION Peritoneal lavage with ertapenem appears to be effective in preventing the adhesion in the septic abdomen. As no difference was detected at the end of a single dose and multiple-dose administration of antibiotics in the adhesion scores, a single dose after surgery seems to be enough. The findings suggest that the results should be evaluated in a clinical trial.

[1]  T. A. Nunes,et al.  Chlorhexidine as a factor that promotes peritoneal adhesions in rats with induced peritonitis. , 2013, Acta cirurgica brasileira.

[2]  E. Yenidoǧan,et al.  Effect of antibiotic lavage in adhesion prevention in bacterial peritonitis. , 2013, Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES.

[3]  M. Meurisse,et al.  Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. , 2011, World journal of gastroenterology.

[4]  H. Kallel,et al.  Rifamycin lavage in the treatment of experimental intra-abdominal infection. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[5]  E. Uysal,et al.  [Assessment of effectiveness of different doses of methylprednisolone on intraabdominal adhesion prevention]. , 2008, Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES.

[6]  O. Levy,et al.  Advances in pathogenesis and management of sepsis , 2007, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[7]  H. Redmond,et al.  Enteric bacteria and their antigens may stimulate postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation. , 2007, Surgery.

[8]  R. Goldberg,et al.  Histologic characterization of vaginal vs. abdominal surgical wound healing in a rabbit model , 2007, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[9]  C. Feo,et al.  Role of Peritoneal Lavage in Adhesion Formation and Survival Rate in Rats: An Experimental Study , 2006, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[10]  R. Isaacs,et al.  Ertapenem, the first of a new group of carbapenems. , 2003, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[11]  S. Kadri,et al.  Role of Intraperitoneal Antibiotic Lavage in Peritonitis , 2003 .

[12]  T. Midtvedt,et al.  The intestinal flora influences adhesion formation around surgical anastomoses , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  C. Gogos,et al.  Pro- versus anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in patients with severe sepsis: a marker for prognosis and future therapeutic options. , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[14]  J. van der Meer,et al.  Coagulation and fibrinolytic responses of human peritoneal fluid and plasma to bacterial peritonitis , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[15]  V. Gomel,et al.  Pathophysiology of adhesion formation and strategies for prevention. , 1996, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[16]  M. Snoj Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation , 1995, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  P. Figert,et al.  Tumor necrosis factor-alpha: a marker for peritoneal adhesion formation. , 1995, The Journal of surgical research.

[18]  J. van der Meer,et al.  Fibrinolytic activity in the abdominal cavity of rats with faecal peritonitis , 1994, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  A. Loh,et al.  Evisceration and other complications of abdominal drains. , 1991, Postgraduate medical journal.

[20]  W. Rappaport,et al.  Antibiotic irrigation and the formation of intraabdominal adhesions. , 1989, American journal of surgery.

[21]  V. Lorian,et al.  Effects of antibiotics on bacterial structure and their pathogenicity. , 1987, Pathologie-biologie.

[22]  N. Matheson,et al.  Effect of topical and systemic antibiotics on bacterial growth kinesis in generalized peritonitis in man , 1987, The British journal of surgery.