Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without know

OBJECTIVES We examined mortality in relation to coronary artery disease (CAD) as assessed by ≥64-detector row coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). BACKGROUND Although CCTA has demonstrated high diagnostic performance for detection and exclusion of obstructive CAD, the prognostic findings of CAD by CCTA have not, to date, been examined for age- and sex-specific outcomes. METHODS We evaluated a consecutive cohort of 24,775 patients undergoing ≥64-detector row CCTA between 2005 and 2009 without known CAD who met inclusion criteria. In these patients, CAD by CCTA was defined as none (0% stenosis), mild (1% to 49% stenosis), moderate (50% to 69% stenosis), or severe (≥70% stenosis). CAD severity was judged on a per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment basis. Time to mortality was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS At a 2.3 ± 1.1-year follow-up, 404 deaths had occurred. In risk-adjusted analysis, both per-patient obstructive (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94 to 3.49; p < 0.0001) and nonobstructive (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.16; p = 0.002) CAD conferred increased risk of mortality compared with patients without evident CAD. Incident mortality was associated with a dose-response relationship to the number of coronary vessels exhibiting obstructive CAD, with increasing risk observed for nonobstructive (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.19; p = 0.002), obstructive 1-vessel (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.43 to 2.82; p < 0.0001), 2-vessel (HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 2.00 to 4.25; p < 0.0001), or 3-vessel or left main (HR: 3.70; 95% CI: 2.58 to 5.29; p < 0.0001) CAD. Importantly, the absence of CAD by CCTA was associated with a low rate of incident death (annualized death rate: 0.28%). When stratified by age <65 years versus ≥65 years, younger patients experienced higher hazards for death for 2-vessel (HR: 4.00; 95% CI: 2.16 to 7.40; p < 0.0001 vs. HR: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.51 to 4.02; p = 0.0003) and 3-vessel (HR: 6.19; 95% CI: 3.43 to 11.2; p < 0.0001 vs. HR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.95 to 4.92; p < 0.0001) CAD. The relative hazard for 3-vessel CAD (HR: 4.21; 95% CI: 2.47 to 7.18; p < 0.0001 vs. HR: 3.27; 95% CI: 1.96 to 5.45; p < 0.0001) was higher for women as compared with men. CONCLUSIONS Among individuals without known CAD, nonobstructive and obstructive CAD by CCTA are associated with higher rates of mortality, with risk profiles differing for age and sex. Importantly, absence of CAD is associated with a very favorable prognosis.

[1]  E. Falk Morphologic features of unstable atherothrombotic plaques underlying acute coronary syndromes. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography in asymptomatic patients. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[4]  M. Hadamitzky,et al.  Prognostic Value of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Diabetic Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[5]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic significance of dyspnea in patients referred for cardiac stress testing. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  B. Chow,et al.  Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, European Heart Journal.

[9]  D. Berman,et al.  Sex Differences in Mortality Associated With Computed Tomographic Angiographic Measurements of Obstructive and Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease: An Exploratory Analysis , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2009, Circulation.

[11]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[12]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography and gated single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  D. Berman,et al.  Application of conditional probability analysis to the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 1980, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[14]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic significance of left ventricular dysfunction to coronary artery disease detection by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for the prediction of all-cause mortality: results from a two-centre study of 5330 patients. , 2010, European heart journal.

[15]  J. Min,et al.  The prognostic value of multidetector coronary CT angiography for the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: a multicenter observational cohort study , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  G. Diamond,et al.  Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognosis by coronary computed tomographic angiography: matched comparison with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[20]  Ioannis Kakadiaris,et al.  Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  L. Shaw,et al.  Impact of Ethnicity and Gender Differences on Angiographic Coronary Artery Disease Prevalence and In-Hospital Mortality in the American College of Cardiology–National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2008, Circulation.

[23]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.