Gender, Group Composition, Cooperation, and Self-Efficacy in Computer Studies

This study aimed to investigate whether gender, group composition, or self-efficacy in computing has any impact on cooperation, giving or getting task-related help, and level of activity in student groups. The groups were established during a computer course among 150 college students in business administration. According to our results, students with low self-efficacy in computing, and students in groups with a majority of females, cooperated more than any other categories in their work with computers. Furthermore, students with high self-efficacy in computing, and students with a high degree of previous computer experience, offered more task-related help to other students than did the rest. In terms of gender, the level of activity was evaluated as highest in majority-female or majority-male groups. Moreover, female students had significantly lower self-efficacy in computing, less previous computer experience, and they had received less previous encouragement to work with computers. Finally, female students were receiving more task-related help, while at the same time giving less task-related help than male students.

[1]  G. Hackett Role of Mathematics Self-Efficacy in the Choice of Math- Related Majors of College Women and Men: A Path Analysis , 1985 .

[2]  David W. Dalton The effects of cooperative learning strategies on achievement and attitudes during interactive video , 1990 .

[3]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[4]  T. Busch Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers , 1995 .

[5]  Stanley D. Stephenson The Use of Small Groups in Computer-Based Training: A Review of Recent Literature. , 1994 .

[6]  Paula Jorde-Bloom,et al.  Self-efficacy expectations as a predictor of computer use: a look at early childhood administrators , 1988 .

[7]  Barbara Brown,et al.  Gender Composition and Small-Group Learning in Fourth-Grade Mathematics , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[8]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarowitz,et al.  Adults in Cooperative Learning: Effects of Group Size and Group Gender Composition on Group Learning Behaviors (A Summary). , 1986 .

[9]  Miwha Lee,et al.  Gender, Group Composition, and Peer Interaction in Computer-Based Cooperative Learning , 1993 .

[10]  I. Miura,et al.  The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college , 1987 .

[11]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women , 1981 .

[12]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  The Relationship of Career-Related Self-Efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men. , 1981 .

[14]  Mariela Tovar,et al.  Collaborative Problem-Solving with Logo: Effects of Group Size and Group Composition , 1987 .

[15]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors , 1983 .

[16]  Robert W. Lent,et al.  Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence. , 1984 .

[17]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Gender Differences in a Cooperative Computer-Based Language Task. , 1990 .

[18]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. , 1994 .

[19]  N. Betz,et al.  An Exploration of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy/Mathematics Performance Correspondence , 1989 .