I—Andy Clark: Cognitive Complexity and the Sensorimotor Frontier

ABSTRACT What is the relation between perceptual experience and the suite of sensorimotor skills that enable us to act in the very world we perceive? The relation, according to ‘sensorimotor models’ (O'Regan and Noe 2001, Noe 2004) is tight indeed. Perceptual experience, on these accounts, is enacted via skilled sensorimotor activity, and gains its content and character courtesy of our knowledge of the relations between (typically) movement and sensory stimulation. I shall argue that this formulation is too extreme, and that it fails to accommodate the substantial firewalls, dis-integrations, and special-purpose streamings that form the massed strata of human cognition. In particular, such strong sensorimotor models threaten to obscure the computationally potent insensitivity of key information-processing events to the full subtleties of embodied cycles of sensing and moving.

[1]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[2]  Melvyn A. Goodale.  Real action in a virtual world , 2001 .

[3]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Andy Clark,et al.  Visual Experience and Motor Action: Are the Bonds Too Tight? , 2001 .

[5]  A Case where Access Implies Qualia , 2000 .

[6]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Language as a dynamical system , 1996 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.

[8]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Embodiment is the foundation, not a level , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Ways of Seeing: The Scope and Limits of Visual Cognition , 2003 .

[10]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[11]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[12]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[13]  Sylvia Weir,et al.  Action perception , 1974 .

[14]  B. Vereijken.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action: E. Thelen and L.B. Smith, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994. Pp. 376. ISBN 0-262-20095-3 , 1996 .

[15]  Richard Rojcewicz.  Thing and Space , 1997 .

[16]  S. Ashford.  REFERENCE AND CONSCIOUSNESS , 2005 .

[17]  D. W. Goodwin,et al.  The Mind's Past , 1999 .

[18]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Joel L. Davis,et al.  Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain , 1994 .

[20]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[21]  M. Sur,et al.  Rewiring cortex: the role of patterned activity in development and plasticity of neocortical circuits. , 1999, Journal of neurobiology.

[22]  Andy Clark,et al.  Towards a Cognitive Robotics , 1999, Adapt. Behav..

[23]  Robert A. Wilson,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition: How to Situate Cognition , 2008 .

[24]  P. Pettit,et al.  Looks as Powers , 2003 .

[25]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[26]  Andy Clark,et al.  Visual Awareness and Visuomotor Action , 1999 .

[27]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  A. Clark.  Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[29]  Mohan Matthen,et al.  Seeing, doing, and knowing , 2005 .