A simple classification system (the Tree flowchart) for breast MRI can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in MRI-only lesions

AbstractObjectivesTo assess whether using the Tree flowchart obviates unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsies in breast lesions only visible on MRI.MethodsThis retrospective IRB-approved study evaluated consecutive suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions only visible on MRI that were referred to our institution for MRI-guided biopsy. All lesions were evaluated according to the Tree flowchart for breast MRI by experienced readers. The Tree flowchart is a decision rule that assigns levels of suspicion to specific combinations of diagnostic criteria. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. To assess reproducibility by kappa statistics, a second reader rated a subset of 82 patients.ResultsThere were 454 patients with 469 histopathologically verified lesions included (98 malignant, 371 benign lesions). The area under the curve (AUC) of the Tree flowchart was 0.873 (95% CI: 0.839–0.901). The inter-reader agreement was almost perfect (kappa: 0.944; 95% CI 0.889–0.998). ROC analysis revealed exclusively benign lesions if the Tree node was ≤2, potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies in 103 cases (27.8%).ConclusionsUsing the Tree flowchart in breast lesions only visible on MRI, more than 25% of biopsies could be avoided without missing any breast cancer.Key Points• The Treeflowchart may obviate >25% of unnecessary MRI-guided breast biopsies.• This decrease in MRI-guided biopsies does not cause any false-negative cases. • The Treeflowchart predicts 30.6% of malignancies with >98% specificity. • The Tree’shigh specificity aids in decision-making after benign biopsy results.

[1]  Matthias Benndorf,et al.  False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  A systematic comparison of two pulse sequences for edema assessment in MR-mammography. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[3]  T. Helbich,et al.  Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  M. Dietzel,et al.  Combined reading of Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging by using a simple sum score , 2016, European Radiology.

[5]  H. Sittek,et al.  Magnetic resonance‐guided, vacuum‐assisted breast biopsy , 2006, Cancer.

[6]  R. Kubik-Huch,et al.  MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques , 2013, European Radiology.

[7]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  The potential of multiparametric MRI of the breast. , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  F. Caumo,et al.  1H-MR spectroscopy of suspicious breast mass lesions at 3T: a clinical experience , 2017, La radiologia medica.

[9]  Robert G. Moore,et al.  Initial clinical experience , 1997 .

[10]  K. Pinker,et al.  Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions , 2013, European Radiology.

[11]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Assessing the degree of collinearity among the lesion features of the MRI BI-RADS lexicon. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[12]  Noam Nissan,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Linda Moy,et al.  Separation of benign and malignant breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in a biopsy cohort , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Christiane K. Kuhl,et al.  MRI-guided breast biopsy: influence of choice of vacuum biopsy system on the mode of biopsy of MRI-only suspicious breast lesions. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  D. Vanel The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[17]  Wolfgang Bogner,et al.  Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors with Multiparametric 18Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Feasibility Study , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  W. Kaiser,et al.  A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography , 2013, European Radiology.

[20]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  Kinetic Analysis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions With Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Standard Kinetic Assessment. , 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  U. Fischer,et al.  [Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions--retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions]. , 2009, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[22]  P. Baltzer,et al.  Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Radiology.

[23]  C. Boetes,et al.  # The Author(s) 2008 , 2007 .

[24]  Ping Liu,et al.  Outcome analysis of 9-gauge MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle breast biopsies. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  L. Liberman,et al.  MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  T. Helbich,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  T. Helbich,et al.  MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy of MRI-only lesions: a single center experience , 2016, European Radiology.

[29]  Peter R Luijten,et al.  Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: The influence of the choice of b‐values , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  T. Helbich,et al.  A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience? , 2016, European Radiology.

[31]  Qian Wu,et al.  Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions , 2010, BMC Cancer.

[32]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Is "prepectoral edema" a morphologic sign for malignant breast tumors? , 2015, Academic radiology.

[33]  T. Helbich,et al.  MRI-Guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions: materials, techniques, success rates, and management in patients with suspected radiologic-pathologic mismatch. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[34]  Li Zhang,et al.  Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[35]  T. Helbich,et al.  Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Noninvasive Imaging Biomarker for the Differentiation of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[36]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Differential Diagnosis of Breast Lesions 5 mm or Less: Is There a Role for Magnetic Resonance Imaging? , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[37]  L. Liberman,et al.  Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  E A Sickles,et al.  Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  T. Helbich,et al.  Improved Diagnostic Accuracy With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging, and 3-Dimensional Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[40]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots , 1994, BMJ.

[41]  Xiaobing Fan,et al.  The diverse pathology and kinetics of mass, nonmass, and focus enhancement on MR imaging of the breast , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[42]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[43]  T. Helbich,et al.  High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: can underestimation be predicted? , 2011, European Radiology.

[44]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[45]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  T. Helbich,et al.  MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies , 2014, European Radiology.

[47]  Christoph I. Lee,et al.  Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[48]  Little Ps Quality assurance guidelines for clinical practice in speech/language pathology. , 1991 .

[49]  J. Hua,et al.  Diagnostic Efficacy of Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography by Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis in Breast Lesions , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[50]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.