Analysis of material solutions for design of construction details of foundation, wall and floor for energy and environmental impacts

The amount of materials and energy resources is limited over the world. These issues lead to increasing interest in environmental impacts of buildings using various building materials and structural systems. Buildings play a significant role in energy consumption and emission production through all phases of their life cycle. Over the last decade, development toward sustainability has become an important issue in building design decisions. The relative contribution of embodied impacts of building materials and constructions has been recognised as being significant, especially for energy-efficient buildings. Life-cycle assessment as a widely used methodology helps make decisions in sustainable building design. The construction details of the foundation, wall and floor are by far the most significant contribution of embodied impacts associated with the construction phase. The goal of this paper is to assess alternative material solutions for the construction details of foundation, wall and floor to support decisions at the design phase of a project. The selection and combination of the materials influences the amount of energy consumption and associated production of emissions during the operation of the building. Therefore, the thermo-physical properties of designed variants of construction details are very significant. This study uses life-cycle analysis with system boundary from cradle to gate and focuses on the embodied energy and equivalent emissions of CO2 and SO2. Methods of multi-criteria decision analysis are used for interpretation of the results.

[1]  A. Dimoudi,et al.  Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings , 2008 .

[2]  Grace Kam Chun Ding,et al.  The development of a multi-criteria approach for the measurement of sustainable performance for built projects and facilities , 2004 .

[3]  Suzana Yusup,et al.  Experimental and modelling studies of carbon dioxide adsorption by porous biomass derived activated carbon , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[4]  Van Straaten,et al.  Thermal Performance of Buildings , 1967 .

[5]  Kristel de Myttenaere,et al.  Towards a more holistic approach to reducing the energy demand of dwellings , 2011 .

[6]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends , 2013 .

[7]  A. Eštoková,et al.  Reduction of primary energy and CO2 emissions through selection and environmental evaluation of building materials , 2012, Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering.

[8]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Building energy-efficiency standards in a life cycle primary energy perspective , 2011 .

[9]  K. Panuwatwanich,et al.  Variations in embodied energy and carbon emission intensities of construction materials , 2014 .

[10]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: an integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process , 2009 .

[11]  Jose L. Fernandez-Solis,et al.  System boundary for embodied energy in buildings: A conceptual model for definition , 2013 .

[12]  A. Eštoková,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Environmental Performance of Building Materials towards Sustainable Construction , 2013 .

[13]  Khaled Galal,et al.  Integrated LCA–LEED sustainability assessment model for structure and envelope systems of school buildings , 2014 .

[14]  Can Çinar,et al.  Effect of ethanol-gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emissions in different compression ratios , 2006 .

[15]  C. S. Oon,et al.  Sustainability and environmental impact of ethanol as a biofuel , 2014 .

[16]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies , 2003 .

[17]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  Development of impact assessment methodologies for environmental sustainability , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[18]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[19]  Adriana Estokova,et al.  Environmental analysis of two building material alternatives in structures with the aim of sustainable construction , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[20]  José Ricardo Sodré,et al.  Hydrous ethanol vs. gasoline-ethanol blend: Engine performance and emissions , 2010 .

[21]  Salim Newaz Kazi,et al.  A comprehensive literature review of bio-fuel performance in internal combustion engine and relevant costs involvement , 2014 .

[22]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Using input-output data in life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[23]  S. Vilčeková,et al.  Reduction of Carbon Footprint of Building Structures , 2012 .

[24]  Sarel Lavy,et al.  Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review , 2010 .

[25]  Adriana Estokova,et al.  Minimization of CO2 Emissions and Primal Energy by Building Materials’ Environmental Evaluation and Optimization , 2011 .

[26]  S. Sikdar.  Quo vadis energy sustainability? , 2009 .

[27]  Robert Ries,et al.  The embodied energy and emissions of a high-rise education building: A quantification using process-based hybrid life cycle inventory model , 2012 .

[28]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) for selection of sewer pipe materials , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[29]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts , 2013 .

[30]  Mark Elder,et al.  Biofuels and resource use efficiency in developing Asia: Back to basics , 2009 .

[31]  Robert Ries,et al.  The embodied energy and environmental emissions of construction projects in China: An economic input–output LCA model , 2010 .

[32]  Mohd Nashrul Mohd Zubir,et al.  A comprehensive review of bio-diesel as alternative fuel for compression ignition engines , 2013 .

[33]  I. Roos,et al.  ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS FOR ESTONIAN ENERGY SECTOR , 2005 .

[34]  Alice Moncaster,et al.  A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards , 2013 .