The impact of warning signal intensity on reaction time and components of the contingent negative variation

Slow EEG potentials were recorded during performance of a simple reaction task in which warning signal intensity was varied from trial to trial under foreperiod durations of 1, 3 and 8 sec. As shown by speed of reaction, the warning signal had an activating effect which increased with its intensity and decreased with foreperiod duration. This effect was related to the amplitude of a slow potential which appears in the EEG shortly after presentation of the warning signal. This potential is interpreted as a component of the orienting response regulating sensitivity to subsequent stimulation, so that reaction time is affected through change in the effective intensity of the imperative signal.

[1]  E. N. Sokolov,et al.  Perception and the Conditioned Reflex , 1965 .

[2]  I. D. John,et al.  A statistical decision theory of simple reaction time , 1967 .

[3]  A. Sanford,et al.  Slow potential correlates of preparatory set. , 1974, Biological psychology.

[4]  G. Grice,et al.  STIMULUS INTENSITY EFFECTS DEPEND UPON THE TYPE OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. , 1964, Psychological review.

[5]  C. K. Adams,et al.  Some properties of the reaction-time ready-signal. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  A. Sanford.  Loudness and Simple Reaction Time , 1972 .

[7]  J. Gray.  STIMULUS INTENSITY DYNAMISM. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  A. Sanford,et al.  Effects of age on the contingent negative variation and preparatory set in a reaction-time task. , 1974, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  W. Walter,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation : An Electric Sign of Sensori-Motor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain , 1964, Nature.

[10]  Grice Gr,et al.  Stimulus intensity and response evocation. , 1968 .

[11]  Richard Lynn,et al.  Attention, arousal, and the orientation reaction , 1966 .

[12]  Distribution of Response to Non-signal Stimuli , 1976 .

[13]  J. Cohen.  Very slow brain potentials relating to expectancy - The CNV , 1969 .

[14]  N. Loveless,et al.  The contingent negative variation related to preparatory set in a reaction time situation with variable foreperiod. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  M. Low,et al.  Surface‐negative, slow‐potential shift associated with conditioning in man , 1966, Neurology.

[16]  G. Razran.  The dominance-contiguity theory of the acquisition of classical conditioning. , 1957, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  W. Walter.  Brain responses to semantic stimuli. , 1965, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[18]  S. Beck.  EYELID CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF CS INTENSITY, UCS INTENSITY, AND MANIFEST ANXIETY SCALE SCORE. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  J. Tecce.  Contingent negative variation (CNV) and psychological processes in man. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.