Trend Analysis from 1970 to 2008 and Model Evaluation of Edgarv4 Global Gridded Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions* Reprint 2014-15 Trend Analysis from 1970 to 2008 and Model Evaluation of Edgarv4 Global Gridded Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions

The MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change combines cutting-edge scientific research with independent policy analysis to provide a solid foundation for the public and private decisions needed to mitigate and adapt to unavoidable global environmental changes. Being data-driven, the Program uses extensive Earth system and economic data and models to produce quantitative analysis and predictions of the risks of climate change and the challenges of limiting human influence on the environment—essential knowledge for the international dialogue toward a global response to climate change. To this end, the Program brings together an interdisciplinary group from two established MIT research centers: the Center for Global Change Science (CGCS) and the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR). These two centers—along with collaborators from the Marine Biology Laboratory (MBL) at Woods Hole and short-and long-term visitors—provide the united vision needed to solve global challenges. At the heart of much of the Program's work lies MIT's Integrated Global System Model. Through this integrated model, the Program seeks to: discover new interactions among natural and human climate system components; objectively assess uncertainty in economic and climate projections; critically and quantitatively analyze environmental management and policy proposals; understand complex connections among the many forces that will shape our future; and improve methods to model, monitor and verify greenhouse gas emissions and climatic impacts. This reprint is one of a series intended to communicate research results and improve public understanding of global environment and energy challenges, thereby contributing to informed debate about climate change and the economic and social implications of policy alternatives. • A global mercury emission inventory over the past four decades was established. • The inventory was at the lower range of the UNEP Minamata estimates. • The inventory was evaluated using a global 3-D mercury model GEOS-Chem. • The model reproduced spatial variations and long-term trends. a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Keywords: Mercury emissions Global gridmaps End-of-pipe impacts Inventory evaluation Atmospheric modelling Artisanal and small-scale gold production The Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) provides a time-series of man-made emissions of greenhouse gases and short-lived atmospheric pollutants from 1970 to 2008. Mercury is included in EDGARv4.tox1, thereby enriching the spectrum of multi-pollutant sources in the database. With an average annual growth rate of 1.3% since 1970, EDGARv4 estimates that the global mercury …

[1]  S. Pal,et al.  Science of the Total Environment , 2018 .

[2]  Elsie M. Sunderland,et al.  Toward the next generation of air quality monitoring: Mercury , 2013 .

[3]  Peter Rafaj,et al.  Scenarios of global mercury emissions from anthropogenic sources , 2013 .

[4]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  BEYOND 2020 — STRATEGIES AND COSTS FOR TRANSFORMING THE EUROPEAN ENERGY SYSTEM , 2013 .

[5]  D. Streets,et al.  Legacy impacts of all‐time anthropogenic emissions on the global mercury cycle , 2013 .

[6]  H. Mao,et al.  Do we understand what the mercury speciation instruments are actually measuring? Results of RAMIX. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  T. Lee,et al.  Estimation of total annual mercury emissions from cement manufacturing facilities in Korea , 2012 .

[8]  Shuxiao Wang,et al.  Update of mercury emissions from China's primary zinc, lead and copper smelters, 2000–2010 , 2012 .

[9]  R. Talbot,et al.  Seasonal and diurnal variations of atmospheric mercury across the US determined from AMNet monitoring data , 2012 .

[10]  D. Streets,et al.  Multi‐decadal decline of mercury in the North Atlantic atmosphere explained by changing subsurface seawater concentrations , 2012 .

[11]  J. Notholt,et al.  Sources of atmospheric mercury in the tropics: continuous observations at a coastal site in Suriname , 2012 .

[12]  R. Martin,et al.  Nested-grid simulation of mercury over North America , 2012 .

[13]  P. Ariya,et al.  Evaluation of discrepancy between measured and modelled oxidized mercury species , 2012 .

[14]  J. Kamdem A nice estimation of Gini index and power Pen's parade , 2012 .

[15]  Y. Seo,et al.  Oxidation, reemission and mass distribution of mercury in bituminous coal-fired power plants with SCR, CS-ESP and wet FGD , 2012 .

[16]  T. Holsen,et al.  Assessment of modeled mercury dry deposition over the Great Lakes region. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[17]  Margaret R. Karagas,et al.  Evidence on the Human Health Effects of Low-Level Methylmercury Exposure , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[18]  D. Streets,et al.  All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human activities. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Xinbin Feng,et al.  Temporal trend and sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at Waliguan GAW station, Northwestern China , 2011 .

[20]  Ashu Dastoor,et al.  A review of uncertainties in atmospheric modeling of mercury chemistry I. Uncertainties in existing kinetic parameters - Fundamental limitations and the importance of heterogeneous chemistry , 2011 .

[21]  P. Grandjean,et al.  Balancing the benefits of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risks of methylmercury exposure from fish consumption. , 2011, Nutrition reviews.

[22]  F. Slemr,et al.  Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1995 , 2011 .

[23]  Jed O. Kaplan,et al.  Impacts of changes in land use and land cover on atmospheric chemistry and air quality over the 21st century , 2011 .

[24]  D. Jacob,et al.  Global atmospheric model for mercury including oxidation by bromine atoms , 2010 .

[25]  D. Jacob,et al.  An improved global model for air-sea exchange of mercury: high concentrations over the North Atlantic. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  F. Takahashi,et al.  Statistical estimate of mercury removal efficiencies for air pollution control devices of municipal solid waste incinerators. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  R. Mason,et al.  Global mercury emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic and natural sources , 2010 .

[28]  Simon Wilson,et al.  Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020 , 2010 .

[29]  Y. Seo,et al.  Effect of selective catalytic reactor on oxidation and enhanced removal of mercury in coal-fired power plants , 2010 .

[30]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China , 2009 .

[31]  Noelle E. Selin,et al.  Global Biogeochemical Cycling of Mercury: A Review , 2009 .

[32]  E. Prestbo Wet deposition of mercury in the U.S. and Canada, 1996-2005: Results and analysis of the NADP mercury deposition network (MDN) , 2009 .

[33]  Prosun Bhattacharya,et al.  Mercury emissions from industrial sources in India and its effects in the environment , 2009 .

[34]  R. Yantosca,et al.  Global 3‐D land‐ocean‐atmosphere model for mercury: Present‐day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition , 2008 .

[35]  H. Skov,et al.  A synthesis of atmospheric mercury depletion event chemistry in the atmosphere and snow , 2008 .

[36]  Y. Seo,et al.  Emission and speciation of mercury from various combustion sources , 2008 .

[37]  Xinbin Feng,et al.  Mercury speciation and emissions from coal combustion in Guiyang, Southwest China. , 2007, Environmental research.

[38]  J. Christensen,et al.  Intercomparison study of atmospheric mercury models: 2. Modelling results vs. long-term observations and comparison of country deposition budgets. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[39]  F. Slemr,et al.  Air‐sea exchange in the global mercury cycle , 2007 .

[40]  Nicola Pirrone,et al.  A Synthesis of Progress and Uncertainties in Attributing the Sources of Mercury in Deposition , 2007, Ambio.

[41]  Donna Mergler,et al.  Methylmercury Exposure and Health Effects in Humans: A Worldwide Concern , 2007, Ambio.

[42]  D. Jacob,et al.  Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury : Global constraints from observations , 2007 .

[43]  Simon Wilson,et al.  Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000 , 2006 .

[44]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Investigation of Selective Catalytic Reduction Impact on Mercury Speciation under Simulated NOx Emission Control Conditions , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[45]  J. Einax,et al.  Measurements of atmospheric mercury species at a coastal site in the Antarctic and over the south Atlantic Ocean during polar summer. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  F. Slemr,et al.  Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1977 , 2003 .

[47]  R. Stevens,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species , 2001 .

[48]  F. Slemr,et al.  International field intercomparison measurements of atmospheric mercury species at Mace Head, Ireland , 1999 .

[49]  Robert Ayers,et al.  The Life‐Cycle of Chlorine, Part I: Chlorine Production and the Chlorine‐Mercury Connection , 1997 .

[50]  S. Jennings,et al.  Decreasing trends in total gaseous mercury observations in baseline air at Mace Head, Ireland from 1996 to 2011 , 2013 .

[51]  P. Ariya,et al.  A review of the sources of uncertainties in atmospheric mercury modeling II. Mercury surface and heterogeneous chemistry – A missing link , 2012 .

[52]  Study on mercury sources and emissions , and analysis of cost and effectiveness of control measures , 2011 .

[53]  F. Steenhuisen AMAP Assessment 2011, Mercury in the Arctic , 2011 .

[54]  Moya Rivera Jose Antonio,et al.  Energy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions - Prospective Scenarios for the Cement Industry , 2010 .

[55]  Marcello M. Veiga,et al.  World emissions of mercury from artisanal and small scale gold mining , 2009 .

[56]  I. Ilyin,et al.  The EMEP/MSC-E mercury modeling system , 2009 .

[57]  Karen E. MacDonald,et al.  The European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register , 2008 .

[58]  P. Maxson Global Mercury Production, Use and Trade , 2005 .

[59]  John L. Sznopek,et al.  The Materials Flow of Mercury in the Economies of the United States and the World , 2000 .