A Focus on Process Improves Problem-Based Learning Outcomes in Large Classes.

In the absence of ongoing, structured, dialogue between the instructor and the students, a tutorless problem-based learning (PBL) format can give rise to several problems that interfere with learning: (i) students’ emotions can interfere with their willingness to participate and decrease the quality of their learning; (ii) misapprehensions and weak thinking, group, and problem-solving skills can cause students to become lost in the problem-solving process, and; (iii) there is no opportunity to examine abilities and skills directly, so that they may be systematically improved. The approach described in this paper addressed these three problems through the explicit introduction of a written dialogue process. Interactive, metacognitive dialogues between the students and the instructor occurred through the use of a learning journal, a reflective journal, student-created examination questions, comprehensive mid-course student self-evaluation of learning needs, and self-directed learning of the needs identified in the self-evaluation process. The results of a questionnaire that was distributed at the end of the students’ final examinations indicated that the students enjoyed the process more than the less structured PBL format, learned more, and were more confident about their learning. Future research must be designed to determine the degree to which process-based education improves students’ propensity and ability to use problem-solving and self-assessment processes, and whether such a process focus improves educational outcomes.

[1]  D. Fazey,et al.  Self‐assessment as a Generic Skill for Enterprising Students: the learning process , 1993 .

[2]  Paul W. Foos,et al.  Effects of Student-Written Questions on Student Test Performance , 1989 .

[3]  Marites F. Piñon,et al.  The Quiz Game: Writing and Explaining Questions Improve Quiz Scores , 1994 .

[4]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Time matters in groups , 1990 .

[5]  Laurie Thomas,et al.  Learning conversations : the self-organised learning way to personal and organisational growth , 1991 .

[6]  E. Ramsden Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[7]  Gerald Grow Teaching Learners To Be Self-Directed , 1991 .

[8]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[9]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[10]  C. Peter Herman,et al.  Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Higher Education. , 1988 .

[11]  Jesse A. Rudnick,et al.  Reflect ... for Better Problem Solving and Reasoning. , 1994 .

[12]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[13]  Wendy Duncan-Hewitt Formulation Problem-Solving as an Alternative to Traditional Pharmaceutics. , 1992 .

[14]  Paul Hettich,et al.  Journal Writing: Old Fare or Nouvelle Cuisine? , 1990 .

[15]  Narrative, Self-Assessment, and the Reflective Learner. , 1993 .

[16]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[17]  T. Fitzgerald Metaphors of Identity: A Culture-Communication Dialogue , 1993 .

[18]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Chapter 1: A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming , 1990 .

[19]  S. Freud In Over Our Heads. The Mental Demands of Modern Life , 1997 .

[20]  Franklin J. Agardy,et al.  How to Read Faster and Better. The Evelyn Wood Reading Dynamics Program. How to Get Everything You Want from Anything You Read as Fast as You Can Think. , 1981 .

[21]  J. Confrey A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming , 1990 .