Validation of Fully Automated VMAT Plan Generation for Library-Based Plan-of-the-Day Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy

Purpose To develop and validate fully automated generation of VMAT plan-libraries for plan-of-the-day adaptive radiotherapy in locally-advanced cervical cancer. Material and Methods Our framework for fully automated treatment plan generation (Erasmus-iCycle) was adapted to create dual-arc VMAT treatment plan libraries for cervical cancer patients. For each of 34 patients, automatically generated VMAT plans (autoVMAT) were compared to manually generated, clinically delivered 9-beam IMRT plans (CLINICAL), and to dual-arc VMAT plans generated manually by an expert planner (manVMAT). Furthermore, all plans were benchmarked against 20-beam equi-angular IMRT plans (autoIMRT). For all plans, a PTV coverage of 99.5% by at least 95% of the prescribed dose (46 Gy) had the highest planning priority, followed by minimization of V45Gy for small bowel (SB). Other OARs considered were bladder, rectum, and sigmoid. Results All plans had a highly similar PTV coverage, within the clinical constraints (above). After plan normalizations for exactly equal median PTV doses in corresponding plans, all evaluated OAR parameters in autoVMAT plans were on average lower than in the CLINICAL plans with an average reduction in SB V45Gy of 34.6% (p<0.001). For 41/44 autoVMAT plans, SB V45Gy was lower than for manVMAT (p<0.001, average reduction 30.3%), while SB V15Gy increased by 2.3% (p = 0.011). AutoIMRT reduced SB V45Gy by another 2.7% compared to autoVMAT, while also resulting in a 9.0% reduction in SB V15Gy (p<0.001), but with a prolonged delivery time. Differences between manVMAT and autoVMAT in bladder, rectal and sigmoid doses were ≤ 1%. Improvements in SB dose delivery with autoVMAT instead of manVMAT were higher for empty bladder PTVs compared to full bladder PTVs, due to differences in concavity of the PTVs. Conclusions Quality of automatically generated VMAT plans was superior to manually generated plans. Automatic VMAT plan generation for cervical cancer has been implemented in our clinical routine. Due to the achieved workload reduction, extension of plan libraries has become feasible.

[1]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Clinical Investigation : Thoracic Cancer Automated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Planning for Stage III Lung Cancer : How Does It Compare With Intensity-Modulated Radio Therapy ? , 2012 .

[2]  Ben J M Heijmen,et al.  iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[3]  Rozilawati Ahmad,et al.  Increasing treatment accuracy for cervical cancer patients using correlations between bladder-filling change and cervix-uterus displacements: proof of principle. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  James L. Bedford,et al.  Beam modeling and VMAT performance with the Agility 160‐leaf multileaf collimator , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[5]  Martijn Ketelaars,et al.  Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Miao-Fen Chen,et al.  Clinical outcome in posthysterectomy cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent Cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy: comparison with conventional radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  X Allen Li,et al.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the stomach and small bowel. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  B. Slotman,et al.  Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Rajat J Kudchadker,et al.  A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  P. Storchi,et al.  The equivalence of multi-criteria methods for radiotherapy plan optimization , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Using overlap volume histogram and IMRT plan data to guide and automate VMAT planning: a head-and-neck case study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[12]  John C Roeske,et al.  Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy in women with gynecologic malignancies. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  John C Roeske,et al.  A dosimetric analysis of acute gastrointestinal toxicity in women receiving intensity-modulated whole-pelvic radiation therapy. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  M S Hoogeman,et al.  Individualized nonadaptive and online-adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment strategies for cervical cancer patients based on pretreatment acquired variable bladder filling computed tomography scans. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Luiza Bondar,et al.  Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Jun Tan,et al.  Knowledge-based prediction of plan quality metrics in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2015, Medical physics.

[17]  Georges Noël,et al.  Conformity index: a review. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  P. Voet,et al.  Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Sebastiaan Breedveld,et al.  A novel approach to multi-criteria inverse planning for IMRT , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Xiaoning Pan,et al.  A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  P. Levendag,et al.  Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Sebastiaan Breedveld,et al.  Comparison of VMAT and IMRT strategies for cervical cancer patients using automated planning. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  J. Crook,et al.  The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy: Present and future. , 2013, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[24]  Peter C Levendag,et al.  Time dependence of intrafraction patient motion assessed by repeat stereoscopic imaging. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Carlos De Wagter,et al.  Physical Characterization of a New Concept Design of an Elekta Radiation Head with Integrated 160-leaf Multi-leaf Collimator , 2009 .