Spoken-word recognition in foreign-accented speech by L2 listeners

Two cross-modal priming studies investigated the recognition of English words spoken with a foreign accent. Auditory English primes were either typical of a Dutch accent or typical of a Japanese accent in English and were presented to both Dutch and Japanese L2 listeners. Lexical-decision times to subsequent visual target words revealed that foreign-accented words can facilitate word recognition for L2 listeners if at least one of two requirements is met: the foreign-accented production is in accordance with the language background of the L2 listener, or the foreign accent is perceptually confusable with the standard pronunciation for the L2 listener. If neither one of the requirements is met, no facilitatory effect of foreign accents on L2 word recognition is found. Taken together, these findings suggest that linguistic experience with a foreign accent affects the ability to recognize words carrying this accent, and there is furthermore a general benefit for L2 listeners for recognizing foreign-accented words that are perceptually confusable with the standard pronunciation.

[1]  W Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features. , 1994, Psychological review.

[2]  A. Cutler,et al.  Processing resyllabified words in French , 2003 .

[3]  Paola Escudero,et al.  Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[4]  Michael H. Long,et al.  The handbook of second language acquisition , 2003 .

[5]  A. Weber,et al.  Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition , 2004 .

[6]  Reiko Akahane-Yamada,et al.  Perceptual assimilation of american English vowels by Japanese listeners , 1996, ICSLP.

[7]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Innate Predispositions and the Effects of Experience in Speech Perception: The Native Language Magnet Theory , 1993 .

[8]  V. Mann,et al.  Native language factors affecting use of vocalic cues to final consonant voicing in English. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  J. B. Lovins,et al.  Loanwords and the phonological structure of Japanese , 1973 .

[11]  D. Gow.  Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity , 2002 .

[12]  Kristin Lemhöfer,et al.  Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[13]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  Variation and assimilation in German: Consequences for lexical access and representation , 2001 .

[14]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[15]  V. Mann,et al.  Use of vocalic cues to consonant voicing and native language background: The influence of experimental design , 1994, Perception & Psychophysics.

[16]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  THE MUTUAL INTELLIGIBILITY OF L2 SPEECH , 2006, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  K. Brannen.  The Role of Perception in Differential Substitution , 2002, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[18]  柴谷 方良,et al.  The languages of Japan , 2009 .

[19]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Mirjam Broersma,et al.  Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners' use of vowel duration. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  P. Ladefoged.  A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[22]  R. Smits.  Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysis , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Susan Robinson.  Dutch , 2007, Cheers!.

[24]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996 .

[25]  Kanae Nishi,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: influence of training sets. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[26]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  Is phonological context always used to recognize variant forms in spoken word recognition? The role of variant frequency and context distribution. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phantom word activation in L2 , 2008 .

[28]  D. Scott,et al.  Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure. , 1984 .

[29]  W. Strange.  Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[30]  Tsuneo Yamada,et al.  Foreign accent in English words produced by Japanese children and adults , 2003 .

[31]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic categories in spoken-word recognition , 2002 .

[32]  B. Planken,et al.  AGE AND ULTIMATE ATTAINMENT IN THE PRONUNCIATION OF A FOREIGN LANGUAGE , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[33]  Erika S. Levy,et al.  Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Do the Beginnings of Spoken Words Have a Special Status in Auditory Word Recognition , 1993 .

[35]  A. Samuel,et al.  The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants , 2009 .

[36]  Cross-linguistic production and perception of Japanese- and Dutch-accented English , 2010 .

[37]  Constance M. Clarke,et al.  Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  D. Whalen,et al.  Perception of the English /s/–/∫/ distinction relies on fricative noises and transitions, not on brief spectral slices , 1991 .

[40]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  A. Simpson,et al.  Imitated or authentic? Listeners' judgements of foreign accents , 2007 .

[42]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners , 1995 .

[43]  J. Mehler,et al.  Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[44]  Murray J. Munro,et al.  Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege , 2007, Phonetica.

[45]  Mark A Pitt,et al.  How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[46]  Michael Swan,et al.  Learner English: a teacher's guide to interference and other problems / Michael Swan, Bernard Smith , 1987 .

[47]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[50]  J. Flege.  Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[51]  A. Peter.  Teaching American English Pronunciation , 1991 .

[52]  B van Ooijen,et al.  Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: evidence from a word reconstruction task. , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[53]  V. Csépe,et al.  The role of perceptual integration in the recognition of assimilated word forms , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  F Bell-Berti,et al.  Some Relationships between Speech Production and Perception , 1979, Phonetica.

[55]  M. Shibatani,et al.  The languages of Japan , 1991 .

[56]  A. Cutler,et al.  Mora or Phoneme? Further Evidence for Language-Specific Listening , 1994 .

[57]  A. Cutler,et al.  Competition dynamics of second-language listening , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  Constance M. Clarke.  Perceptual adjustment to foreign-accented English with short term exposure , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[59]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[60]  Cynthia M. Connine,et al.  Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition , 2007 .

[61]  Meghan Sumner,et al.  Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/ , 2005 .

[62]  Kenneth Hyltenstam,et al.  Maturational constraints in SLA , 2008 .

[63]  A. Lotto,et al.  Putting phonetic context effects into context: A commentary on Fowler (2006) , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Mirjam Broersmab.  Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positionsa ) , 2005 .

[65]  Mirjam Broersma.  Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  J. Flege,et al.  An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[67]  R. Stibbard,et al.  Evidence against the mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit hypothesis. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[68]  D. Markham.  Listeners and disguised voices: the imitation and perception of dialectal accent , 1999 .

[69]  Mirjam Broersma,et al.  Increased lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening , 2012 .

[70]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[71]  A. Nabelek,et al.  English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  Mirjam Broersma,et al.  Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[73]  J. Werker,et al.  Japanese Listeners' Perceptions of Phonotactic Violations , 2005, Language and speech.

[74]  Cynthia M Connine,et al.  It’s not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[75]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .

[76]  A. Weber,et al.  Sink positive: Linguistic experience with th substitutions influences nonnative word recognition , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[77]  J. Morton,et al.  Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life , 2008 .

[78]  C. Pallier,et al.  The Influence of Native-Language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based Versus Abstract Lexical Entries , 2001, Psychological science.

[79]  E. Vajda.  Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet , 2000 .

[80]  D. Massaro.  Speech Perception By Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry , 1989 .

[81]  Holger Mitterer,et al.  Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[82]  R. Diehl,et al.  On the Objects of Speech Perception , 1989 .

[83]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[84]  Andrea Weber,et al.  Production of English interdental fricatives by Dutch, German, and English speakers , 2010 .

[85]  M. P. Haggard,et al.  The devoicing of voiced fricatives , 1978 .

[86]  N. Mazer.  A Figure of Speech , 1973 .

[87]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonetic precision in listening , 2005 .

[88]  N Gordon,et al.  The acquisition of a second language. , 2000, European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society.

[89]  Donna A. Tate.  Preliminary data on dialect in speech disguise , 1979 .

[90]  James M. McQueen,et al.  The effect of an unfamiliar regional accent on spoken-word comprehension , 2007 .

[91]  Shimon Sapir,et al.  Listening with an Accent: Speech Perception in a Second Language by Late Bilinguals , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[92]  Sander J. van Wijngaarden,et al.  Intelligibility of native and non-native Dutch speech , 2001, Speech Commun..

[93]  周宜童.  浅谈美国英语(American English) , 1999 .

[94]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  First- and Second-language Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[95]  N. Sebastián-Gallés,et al.  The Influence of Initial Exposure on Lexical Representation: Comparing Early and Simultaneous Bilinguals. , 2005 .

[96]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[97]  R. Smits,et al.  Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[98]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[99]  Takashi Otake,et al.  Asymmetric mapping from phonetic to lexical representations in second-language listening , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[100]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Accessing Spoken Words : The Importance of Word Onsets , 2004 .

[101]  R. Schreuder,et al.  The Recognition of Reduced Word Forms , 2002, Brain and Language.

[102]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Regional and Foreign Accent Processing in English: Can Listeners Adapt? , 2009, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[103]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[104]  Cynthia G. Clopper,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[105]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Lexical access of resyllabified words: Evidence from phoneme monitoring , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[106]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[107]  J. Flege,et al.  Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[108]  A. Cutler,et al.  Pseudo‐homophony in non‐native listening , 2004 .

[109]  D. Gow.  Assimilation and Anticipation in Continuous Spoken Word Recognition , 2001 .

[110]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Lexical influence in phonetic decision-making: Evidence from subcategorical mismatches , 1999 .

[111]  Mirjam Broersma,et al.  Comprehension of non-native speech: inaccurate phoneme processing and activation of lexical competitors , 2002, INTERSPEECH.