Generalizability of center of pressure measures of quiet standing.

Center of pressure (COP) measures are commonly used as indicators of balance and postural control. At present, there are no universally accepted standards in research investigating fluctuations in the COP with regard to the number of trials or the length of a given trial. The purpose of this study was to use the tools of Generalizability Theory (G-Theory) to investigate the reliability of COP measures of quiet standing and to establish an optimal measurement protocol. G-Theory provides a tool that allows us to break down the sources of variation, or facets, in a measurement procedure and ultimately design a protocol that provides optimal reliability. Fifteen participants completed 10 90-s trials with eyes open and closed. COP measures of anterior-posterior standard deviation (SD(AP)), medial-lateral SD (SD(ML)), average velocity (Vel), and 95% confidence ellipse area (Area) were calculated using the first 30, 60, and 90s of each trial. A G-study and follow-up D-studies were performed to estimate reliability coefficients (G-coefficients). The results of the G-Theory analysis suggest that these COP measures reached acceptable levels of reliability (G>or=0.70) with at least five 60s trials.

[1]  M. Bove,et al.  Effect of cognitive and motor tasks on postural stability in Parkinson's disease: A posturographic study , 2003, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[2]  T. Kuan,et al.  Performance of static standing balance in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy under altered sensory environments. , 1999, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[3]  P. E. Sullivan,et al.  Balance and physical impairments after stroke. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Mohammed Ferdjallah,et al.  Analysis of postural control synergies during quiet standing in healthy children and children with cerebral palsy. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  J. Collins,et al.  Predicting the dynamic postural control response from quiet-stance behavior in elderly adults. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Generalizability Theory: A Primer , 1991 .

[7]  P. Era,et al.  Relationships Between Standing Balance and Symmetry Measurements in Patients Following Recent Strokes (≤3 Weeks) or Older Strokes (≥6 Months) , 2004 .

[8]  Lee Nolan,et al.  Aging, muscle activity, and balance control: physiologic changes associated with balance impairment. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[9]  David A. Winter,et al.  Human balance and posture control during standing and walking , 1995 .

[10]  A. Nardone,et al.  Human stance stability improves with the repetition of the task: effect of foot position and visual condition , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  P. Era,et al.  Relationships between standing balance and symmetry measurements in patients following recent strokes (3 weeks or less) or older strokes (6 months or more). , 2004, Physical therapy.

[12]  C. Riach,et al.  Postural stability measures: what to measure and for how long. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  P. Goldie,et al.  Force platform measures for evaluating postural control: reliability and validity. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  T.E. Prieto,et al.  Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  V. Hatzitaki,et al.  Age-induced modifications of static postural control in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  D S Nichols,et al.  Balance retraining after stroke using force platform biofeedback. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[17]  T. M. Wood,et al.  Measurement Concepts in Physical Education and Exercise Science , 1989 .

[18]  Daniel A Bloch,et al.  Postural balance in children with cerebral palsy. , 2002, Developmental medicine and child neurology.