Strategic Contracting and Supplier Encroachment Through an E-commerce Platform

This paper considers a supplier's encroachment strategy through an e-commerce platform. When the supplier sells goods through an online channel in addition to a traditional retailer, it should either select a conventional wholesale contract or an emerging agency contract. Under the agency contract, the supplier can directly set its retail price while sales revenues are split with the platform according to a royalty rate (also called a commission rate). The platform should determine its optimal royalty rate by considering the supplier's decision on which contract to select. I show that the royalty rate is set at the highest level possible while still inducing the supplier to choose the agency contract, above which, the wholesale contract is chosen. Moreover, compared with when the supplier does not encroach, adding the online channel is beneficial to the encroaching supplier but is detrimental to the traditional retailer. More interestingly, all firms (a supplier, retailer, and platform) can benefit from recent industrial changes from traditional wholesale agreements toward agency agreements when brick-and-mortar and online channels are highly substitutable.

[1]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer , 1991 .

[2]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Price competition in a duopoly common retailer channel , 1996 .

[3]  M. Waterson,et al.  Product Range and Interfirm Competition , 1996 .

[4]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual - Channel Supply - Chain Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Boiling Frogs: Pricing Strategies for a Manufacturer Adding a Direct Channel that Competes with the Traditional Channel , 2006 .

[6]  T. Hendershott,et al.  A Model of Direct and Intermediated Sales , 2006 .

[7]  D. Sappington,et al.  The Bright Side of Supplier Encroachment , 2007 .

[8]  Ming Fan,et al.  A supply chain model with direct and retail channels , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Steven M. Shugan,et al.  Managing Channel Profits , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[10]  Yunzeng Wang,et al.  Revenue‐Sharing vs. Wholesale‐Price Contracts in Assembly Systems with Random Demand , 2004 .

[11]  A. Tsay,et al.  Channel Conflict and Coordination in the E‐Commerce Age , 2004 .

[12]  Kinshuk Jerath,et al.  Store within a Store , 2010 .

[13]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Firm Strategies in the "Mid Tail" of Platform-Based Retailing , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[14]  Ying‐ju Chen,et al.  Strategic Motive of Introducing Internet Channels in a Supply Chain , 2012 .

[15]  Direct Marketing in Oligopoly , 2012 .

[16]  Ying‐ju Chen,et al.  The perils of selling online: Manufacturer competition, channel conflict, and consumer preferences , 2013 .

[17]  Danilo C. Dantas,et al.  Which business model for e-book pricing? , 2014 .

[18]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Product variety and channel structure strategy for a retailer-Stackelberg supply chain , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Ming Fan,et al.  An Analysis of Pricing Models in the Electronic Book Market , 2014, MIS Q..

[20]  Zhuoxin Li,et al.  Supplier Encroachment under Asymmetric Information , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Xiaobo Zhao,et al.  Supplier encroachment in competitive supply chains , 2015 .

[22]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Supplier Encroachment as an Enhancement or a Hindrance to Nonlinear Pricing , 2015 .

[23]  Yongjian Li,et al.  "Do the electronic books reinforce the dynamics of book supply chain market?"-A theoretical analysis , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Jian Chen,et al.  Online Manufacturer Referral to Heterogeneous Retailers , 2015 .

[25]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Marketplace or Reseller? , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Albert Y. Ha,et al.  Quality in Supply Chain Encroachment , 2016, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[27]  Kenji Matsui,et al.  Asymmetric product distribution between symmetric manufacturers using dual-channel supply chains , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Vibhanshu Abhishek,et al.  Agency Selling or Reselling? Channel Structures in Electronic Retailing , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Yinliang Tan,et al.  The Agency Model for Digital Goods , 2016, Decis. Sci..

[30]  Justin P. Johnson The Agency Model and MFN Clauses , 2017 .

[31]  J. Carrillo,et al.  Strategic Analysis of the Agency Model for Digital Goods , 2017 .

[32]  Kenji Matsui,et al.  When should a manufacturer set its direct price and wholesale price in dual-channel supply chains? , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Srinivasan Raghunathan,et al.  Platform or Wholesale? a Strategic Tool for Online Retailers to Benefit from Third-Party Information , 2017 .

[34]  Jianqing Chen,et al.  Platform or Wholesale? A Strategic Tool for Online Retailers to Benefit from Third-Party Information , 2013, MIS Q..

[35]  Hans Jarle Kind,et al.  Apple's agency model and the role of most‐favored‐nation clauses , 2017 .

[36]  Ruiqing Zhao,et al.  Strategic introduction of the marketplace channel under spillovers from online to offline sales , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Qihui Lu,et al.  Who benefit from agency model: A strategic analysis of pricing models in distribution channels of physical books and e-books , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  X. Guan,et al.  Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment , 2017 .

[39]  Xianjun Geng,et al.  How Add-On Pricing Interacts with Distribution Contracts , 2018 .

[40]  A. Vakharia,et al.  Marketplace, Reseller, or Hybrid: Strategic Analysis of an Emerging E‐Commerce Model , 2018, Production and Operations Management.

[41]  Yuelin Shen,et al.  Channel Selection and Contracting in the Presence of a Retail Platform , 2018, Production and Operations Management.

[42]  Yong Tan,et al.  Who Wants Consumers to Be Informed? Facilitating Information Disclosure in a Distribution Channel , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Do Agency Contracts Facilitate Upstream Collusion? , 2019 .

[44]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Controlling vs. Enabling , 2019, Manag. Sci..