Zebra reduce predation risk in mixed-species herds by eavesdropping on cues from giraffe

Predation risk of individuals moving in multispecies herds may be lower due to the heightened ability of the different species to detect predators (i.e., mixed-species effect). The giraffe is the tallest land mammal, maintains high vigilance levels, and has good eyesight. As a result, heterospecific herd members could reduce their predation risk if they keyed off the giraffe’s antipredator behaviors. However, because giraffe rarely use audible alarm snorts, heterospecifics would need to eavesdrop on cues given off by the giraffe that indicate predator presence (e.g., body posture), to benefit from herding with giraffe. To test this, we compared the vigilance of zebra herding with conspecifics, with those herding with giraffe. Our results indicate that giraffe reduce zebra vigilance in zebra–giraffe herds and that in these herds, giraffe are the primary source of information regarding predation risk. In contrast, when zebra herd with conspecifics, they rely primarily on personal information gleaned from their environment, as opposed to obtaining information from conspecifics about predation risk.

[1]  H. Fritz,et al.  The Effect of Simulated African Wild Dog Presence on Anti‐predator Behaviour of Kudu and Impala , 2012 .

[2]  J. Skinner,et al.  Orbit Orientation and Eye Morphometrics in Giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) , 2013 .

[3]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  P. Kappeler,et al.  Anti-predator behavior of group-living Malagasy primates: mixed evidence for a referential alarm call system , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  P. Marler,et al.  Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. , 1980, Science.

[6]  Adrian M. Shrader,et al.  Increases in food availability can tempt oribi antelope into taking greater risks at both large and small spatial scales , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Eben Goodale,et al.  Response to conspecific and heterospecific alarm calls in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rainforest , 2008 .

[8]  L. Isbell,et al.  Sex Differences in Giraffe Feeding Ecology: Energetic and Social Constraints , 2010 .

[9]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Foraging in groups allows collective predator detection in a mammal species without alarm calls , 2013 .

[10]  J. Dutoit Feeding‐height stratification among African browsing ruminants , 1990 .

[11]  David L. Bergman,et al.  Predator and heterospecific stimuli alter behaviour in cattle , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[12]  The giraffe. Its biology, behaviour, and ecology Anne Innis Dagg, and J. Bristol Foster. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, N.Y., 1976, 210 pp., 53 illus., ISBN 0-442-22431-1 , 1979, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  A. Harman,et al.  Horse vision and an explanation for the visual behaviour originally explained by the 'ramp retina'. , 1999, Equine veterinary journal.

[14]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Individual vigilance of African herbivores while drinking: the role of immediate predation risk and context , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Olivier Pays,et al.  On the Advantages of Mixed-Species Groups: Impalas Adjust Their Vigilance When Associated With Larger Prey Herbivores , 2014 .

[16]  K. Martin,et al.  Male vigilance in white-tailed ptarmigan, Lagopus leucurus : mate guarding or predator detection? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  S. Creel,et al.  Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  G. Kerley,et al.  Prey preferences of the lion (Panthera leo) , 2005 .

[19]  Neil B. Metcalfe,et al.  The effects of habitat on the vigilance of shorebirds: Is visibility important? , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  S. Creel,et al.  Effects of predation risk on group size, vigilance, and foraging behavior in an African ungulate community , 2014 .

[21]  Justin S. Brashares,et al.  Patterns of predation in a diverse predator–prey system , 2003, Nature.

[22]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Social information, social feeding, and competition in group-living goats (Capra hircus) , 2007 .

[23]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[24]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Distinguishing signals and cues: bumblebees use general footprints to generate adaptive behaviour at flowers and nest , 2007, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[25]  Richard L. Doty,et al.  7 – The Pheromone Concept in Mammalian Chemical Communication: A Critique , 1976 .

[26]  M. Elgar,et al.  PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1989, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[27]  C. Fitzgibbon A cost to individuals with reduced vigilance in groups of Thomson's Gazelles hunted by Cheetahs , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Robert M. Seyfarth,et al.  Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Michael M. Delm Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  Christopher C. Wilmers,et al.  Determining the relative importance of dilution and detection for zebra foraging in mixed-species herds , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[32]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Meerkat helpers increase sentinel behaviour and bipedal vigilance in the presence of pups , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  S. Crispin,et al.  Equine Ophthalmology: An Atlas and Text , 2004 .

[34]  V. Gelder,et al.  The Serengeti Lion , 1973 .

[35]  D. E. Davis,et al.  The Giraffe: Its Biology, Behavior, and Ecology , 1976 .