Individual differences in the use of simplification strategies in a complex decision-making task.

suggesting that these subjects adopted simplification strategies at high levels of task complexity. Reliable individual differences in these trend components were observed, consistent with individual differences in motivation and/or processing capacities. These individual differences were included in an information-processing model of decision behavior that captured the choice time data observed in this study. Subjects' ratings of apartments were used as a basis to assess the extent to which the use of simplification strategies resulted in preference reversals. Contrary to expectation, subjects whose choice times contained quadratic components demonstrated fewer preference reversals at high levels of information load.

[1]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Decision Time as a Function of Task Complexity , 1975 .

[2]  C. Park.  A seven-point scale and a decision-maker's simplifying choice strategy: An operationalized satisficing-plus model , 1978 .

[3]  Peter Wright,et al.  Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing: , 1975 .

[4]  R. Sternberg.  Intelligence, Information Processing and Analogical Reasoning : The Componential Analysis of Human Abilities , 1977 .

[5]  Charles A. Kiesler,et al.  Conflict and Number of Choice Alternatives , 1966 .

[6]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[7]  Charles Vlek,et al.  Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making , 1975 .

[8]  J. Kelso,et al.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M. Weitzman.  Optimal search for the best alternative , 1978 .

[10]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[11]  J. Payne,et al.  Risky choice: An examination of information acquisition behavior , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[12]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Decision time as a function of the number and complexity of equally attractive alternatives. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[14]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension , 1974 .

[15]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[16]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  The Organization of Product Information in Memory Identified By Recall Times , 1978 .

[17]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[18]  Oswald Huber,et al.  The influence of some task variables on cognitive operations in an information-processing decision model , 1980 .

[19]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski,et al.  A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: The effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes , 1980 .

[21]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load , 1974 .

[22]  J. Payne,et al.  Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research , 1978 .

[23]  R. Pollay.  A model of decision times in difficult decision situations. , 1970, Psychological review.

[24]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[25]  Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski,et al.  Problem solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. , 1978 .

[26]  H. J. Einhorn.  The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. , 1970, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  H. J. Einhorn.  Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information , 1971 .

[28]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .