Experimental study on unidirectional pedestrian flows in a corridor with a fixed obstacle and a temporary obstacle

Abstract Pedestrians may encounter obstacles during walking, and necessary actions such as reducing velocity and changing the walking direction will be made to avoid collisions. Previous studies on the effect of obstacles on pedestrian dynamics mainly focused on fixed obstacles, but the influence of temporary obstacles, such as the sudden stop caused by a moving pedestrian, has not been investigated. In this paper, a series of controlled experiments were conducted to explore the influence of fixed obstacles and temporary obstacles on the unidirectional pedestrian flow in a corridor. For the fixed obstacle, it was found that pedestrians would change their walking direction and reducing velocity at varied distances away from the obstacle. Interestingly, right side preference during evading maneuvers can be observed, and some pedestrians are not urgent to return to the initial route after passing by the obstacle. In terms of temporary obstacles, such as the sudden stop during pedestrian movement, influences of stop duration, stop position, crowd density on pedestrian movements and evading behaviors of the affected pedestrians at different positions were studied. Generally, the longer the stop duration, the more pedestrians would be affected, and the affected pedestrians may change their routes at a further distance from the temporary obstacle. By analyzing the stop position, a temporary stop near the boundary would be a better choice when compared to that in the middle part of the corridor, since other pedestrians are less affected. In addition, in an environment with a relatively high crowd density, the affected pedestrians would usually experience significant decrease in velocity and obvious deviation in their trajectory. For pedestrians in the same lane with the temporary obstacle, it is obvious that the person right behind the pedestrian would be the most affected. With the increase in the sequence number after the temporary obstacle, the influence on velocity and target drift angle will gradually be reduced. The results of the present study can contribute to the relative modeling of pedestrian dynamics with fixed and temporary obstacles, and provide useful insights to crowd management.

[1]  Partha Chakroborty,et al.  Comparison of Pedestrian Fundamental Diagram across Cultures , 2009, Adv. Complex Syst..

[2]  Mohcine Chraibi,et al.  Experimental study of pedestrian flow through right-angled corridor: uni- and bidirectional scenarios , 2019, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment.

[3]  Daichi Yanagisawa,et al.  Traffic flow in a crowd of pedestrians walking at different speeds. , 2019, Physical review. E.

[4]  Yongxiang Zhao,et al.  Experimental verification of escape efficiency enhancement by the presence of obstacles , 2020 .

[5]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[6]  Tie-Qiao Tang,et al.  Modeling and simulating the pedestrian flow in a training school classroom during the pickup period , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[7]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Transitions in pedestrian fundamental diagrams of straight corridors and T-junctions , 2011, 1102.4766.

[8]  Roger L. Hughes,et al.  A continuum theory for the flow of pedestrians , 2002 .

[9]  Zhangang Han,et al.  Obstacle Optimization for Panic Flow - Reducing the Tangential Momentum Increases the Escape Speed , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  Weiguo Song,et al.  The stepping behavior analysis of pedestrians from different age groups via a single-file experiment , 2018 .

[11]  W. L. Wang,et al.  An Agent-Based Microscopic Pedestrian Flow Simulation Model for Pedestrian Traffic Problems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  A. Schadschneider,et al.  Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two dimensional cellular automaton , 2001 .

[13]  Yi Ma,et al.  Pedestrian stepping dynamics in single-file movement , 2018, Physical Review E.

[14]  Andreas Schadschneider,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Pedestrian Trajectories from Video Recordings , 2010 .

[15]  Yong Qin,et al.  An improved model of passenger merging in a Y-shaped passage , 2020 .

[16]  Bin Jia,et al.  Uni- and bi-directional pedestrian flow in the view-limited condition: Experiments and modeling , 2016 .

[17]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Examining effect of architectural adjustment on pedestrian crowd flow at bottleneck , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[18]  Rui Jiang,et al.  Observational characteristics of pedestrian flows under high-density conditions based on controlled experiments , 2019 .

[19]  Weiguo Song,et al.  Experimental and modeling study on relation of pedestrian step length and frequency under different headways , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[20]  Jie Fang,et al.  The effect of obstacle layouts on pedestrian flow in corridors: An experimental study , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[21]  K. Nishinari,et al.  Introduction of frictional and turning function for pedestrian outflow with an obstacle. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  K. Nishinari,et al.  Experimental study on the evading behavior of individual pedestrians when confronting with an obstacle in a corridor , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[23]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Pedestrian Behavior at Bottlenecks , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[24]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Discrete Choice Models for Pedestrian Walking Behavior , 2006 .

[25]  Shuchao Cao,et al.  Fundamental diagrams for pedestrian traffic flow in controlled experiments , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[26]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  Armin Seyfried,et al.  Linking pedestrian flow characteristics with stepping locomotion , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[28]  S. I. Azeezullah,et al.  Bottlenecks in granular flow: when does an obstacle increase the flow rate in an hourglass? , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Lubos Buzna,et al.  Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[30]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[31]  Siuming Lo,et al.  Experimental study on microscopic moving characteristics of pedestrians in built corridor based on digital image processing , 2010 .

[32]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  A review on the performance of an obstacle near an exit on pedestrian crowd evacuation , 2019, Safety Science.

[33]  Jian Ma,et al.  An experimental study on four-directional intersecting pedestrian flows , 2015 .

[34]  Jian Ma,et al.  A study on passengers’ alighting and boarding process at metro platform by computer simulation , 2020 .

[35]  Wei Lv,et al.  A Two-Dimensional Optimal Velocity Model for Unidirectional Pedestrian Flow Based on Pedestrian's Visual Hindrance Field , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[36]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Contrastive study on the single-file pedestrian movement of the elderly and other age groups , 2019, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment.

[37]  Shuchao Cao,et al.  Dynamic analysis of pedestrian movement in single-file experiment under limited visibility , 2019, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..