Disruptive Pedagogies and Technologies in Universities

This paper is a reaction to the increasing high cost of higher education and the resulting inaccessibility for the millions of potential learners now seeking opportunities for quality higher education opportunities. The paper examines the cost centers associated with campus-based and online education systems and then suggests that disaggregation may prove to be a cost-effective way to reduce tuition payments, while maintaining quality. The paper suggests that discount service models, now available to consumers in many industries may also be attractive in new models of higher education. The paper also briefly looks at the Open Educational Resources University initiative, a pilot, collaborative project attempting to test some of these innovations in a consortium of high quality, accredited public universities. Finally, we note both the disruptive characteristics of this model and commiserate opportunities for innovative providers of higher education.

[1]  Jane A. Stallings Allocated Academic Learning Time Revisited, or Beyond Time on Task , 1980 .

[2]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[3]  G. Gibbs The Relationship Between Quality in Research and Quality in Teaching. , 1995 .

[4]  A. Gokhale Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[5]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relationship Between Research and Teaching: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[6]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[7]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[8]  Z. Berge,et al.  Barriers to distance education as perceived by managers and administrators: Results of a survey , 2000 .

[9]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[10]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Thinking and Computer Conferencing: A Model and Tool to Assess Cognitive Presence , 2001 .

[11]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction , 2002 .

[12]  T. Pocklington,et al.  No Place to Learn: Why Universities Aren't Working , 2002 .

[13]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[14]  T. Anderson Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction , 2003 .

[15]  Terry Anderson Student Services In A Networked World , 2004 .

[16]  Stacey Ludwig Learner Support in Open, Distance and Online Learning Environments , 2005 .

[17]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[18]  Joanna C. Dunlap,et al.  Designing for Deep and Meaningful Student-to-Content Interactions , 2007 .

[19]  Glenda A. Gunter The Effects of the Impact of Instructional Immediacy on Cognition and Learning in Online Classes , 2007 .

[20]  I. Mcneely,et al.  Reinventing Knowledge: From Alexandria to the Internet , 2008 .

[21]  Scott Stern,et al.  Disclosure or secrecy? The dynamics of Open Science☆ , 2009 .

[22]  Roy Williams,et al.  The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC , 2010, Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning.

[23]  Chad J. McGuire,et al.  An Analysis of Student Self-Assessment of Online, Blended, and Face-to-Face Learning Environments: Implications for Sustainable Education Delivery , 2010 .

[24]  T. Mottet,et al.  The Effect of Instructor Nonverbal Immediacy Behaviors and Feedback Sensitivity on Hispanic Students' Affective Learning Outcomes in Ninth-Grade Writing Conferences , 2011 .

[25]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  The Excellent Online Instructor: Strategies for Professional Development , 2011 .

[26]  Luis Miguel,et al.  (THREE TYPES OF INTERACTION (3TI) IN ONLINE LEARNING OF CURRICULUM AND TEACHING CAPACITIES (CTCS) OF TEACHERS OF THE CANARY ISLANDS' EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM) , 2011 .

[27]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics, 2010. NCES 2011-015. , 2011 .

[28]  Syed Shafqat Ali Shah IMPACT OF TEACHER’S BEHAVIOUR ON THE ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS , 2011 .

[29]  Raymond Swaray,et al.  An evaluation of a group project designed to reduce free-riding and promote active learning , 2012 .

[30]  Sven C. Voelpel,et al.  The Innovative University: Changing the DNA of Higher Education From the Inside Out , 2013 .

[31]  Steven L. Goldman Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science , 2014 .